- Joined
- Aug 8, 2023
I really can't wait for next season. The men especially. Most fun/interesting single league in the world right now is Russian men IMO.Looking forward to a rematch next year.![]()
![]()
![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I really can't wait for next season. The men especially. Most fun/interesting single league in the world right now is Russian men IMO.Looking forward to a rematch next year.![]()
![]()
![]()
This post reminds me how it's useless to debate with you and @AlexBreeze cuz you two just love to pull up with some stats.Master-post on the Lutz. Even with statistics on juniors vs seniors:
I'm surprised 3Lo was the first triple.
I wonder if the difficulty feels different for men versus women. I can only comment on women since thats what I watch. I will do so now.
For triples we have the following order:
3T
3S
3Lo
3F
3Lz
3Lz seems to be the only one that consistently trips up the top girls, even the ones who jump quads.
The only girl I can find who clearly prefers the Lutz to the flip is Sadkova, see the following:
![]()
![]()
You can also decide what the following means to you in regards to Agaeva...
And, Sadkova's Lutz has been butchered since then more than anything else. Definitely a wrap.
How I been studying to get on Alex & Bean's level:This post reminds me how it's useless to debate with you and @AlexBreeze cuz you two just love to pull up with some stats.
That whole program was clearly drafted up in a few days. I wouldn't take much from this performance at all. They might not even keep it for next season.I only watched Kamila, but it was ordinary although she has some good individual element. Terrible choreography. Everything was a bit too messy, too hurried, trying to do too much. And her skating skills which were already regressing in that 2023/24 season, have worsened. With her height and size it's like she has trouble controlling her body at times. It's legs and arms going everywhere.
I think they really need to simplify her program and get back to basics like Liu and Glenn have had success doing they have very simple choreography, just aim to complete a clean simple program without interruptions, and the Japanese kind of ignore the use of their upper body altogether and just aim for speed. Is it worth overcomplicating a program to get 36 PCS when you can get 32-33 skating something simple with wooden choreography?
Kamila is without rival in the use of her upper body (or entire body), her flexibility, but nothing about the program works at the moment. Even if it were clean it's not something I would rewatch.
So far not too good points-wise because of UR and generally not too good landings. But it's obvious that Zhenya has stamina and everything to compete with 5 quads (actually he once went for six ones).
A bit of weird he's preparing 4Lz for every event but ends up not including it.
He can improve his BV by more difficult combos and one more combo spin. But generally, yes, he does. I think it's possible to build a good program around 5 quads. But I don't think two 3As are necessary after 5 quads.Does Zhenya really, really needs these 5 quads to stay competitive? Isn't there any other way?
I don't know. He scored 296 at Nats with just 4 quads and some mistakes. His SP only had 4T and 4S. Mightn't it be worth it to just add the Loop into the SP over the Toe Loop and then maybe replace the solo 4S with a flip if it's stable enough instead of pushing 5 quads in total? Then just upgrade his other BV a little as you suggest? It would easily push him over 300 clean. He almost beat Petr already. He is a pretty clear 2nd after Petr right now and the gap is not big. I mean it all depends on how much form he can put on by next season. I think he can do 5 quads in theory but why do you think it's "necessary" to stay competitive if he's already doing so well? We almost never see 300s at Nats. In fact, I think this was the first time? Has anyone else ever scored 300 at Nats except Petr?He can improve his BV by more difficult combos and one more combo spin. But generally, yes, he does. I think it's possible to build a good program around 5 quads. But I don't think two 3As are necessary after 5 quads.
Petr wasn't clean at Nats. Zhenya did literally everything he could. There were no "some mistakes". He still lost with a gap. If Mark skated clean, Zhenya would lose to him, too. In RGPF, he nearly lost to Ugozhaev.He almost beat Petr already.
Because the second one isn't necessary scoring-wise. He'll have same BV repeating 3T instead.Also, what's wrong with the 3As?
But still at face value Mark has only passed 296 once in his career. They have the same FS BV and the SP gap is 1 point (same with Vlad). So, just adding a 4Lo there would compensate, though I don't see Mark as a huge risk anyways. Ugozhaev, Petr and Vlad are BV risks. Frankly, I think with the current scoring anyone will require Petr to make a mistake anyways. However, the current gap between Semenenko and Vlad/Ugo is still less than 10 points total assuming the latter are perfect. Would adding the Lo and F, making minor adjustments to other combos and focusing on non-jumping elements/PCS result in far better consistency and holistic skating generally? I think this would all more than account for the BV gap. I mean, it would definitely leave Mark behind, and at worst just make him generally equal with the other 2. Forcing an extra quad seems cheap and unreliable. I would be happy if be succeeds but I would only support this if he's very confident.Petr wasn't clean at Nats. Zhenya did literally everything he could. There were no "some mistakes". He still lost with a gap. If Mark skated clean, Zhenya would lose to him, too. In RGPF, he nearly lost to Ugozhaev.
Because the second one isn't necessary scoring-wise. He'll have same BV repeating 3T instead.
I don't think we should compare scores of different events.But still at face value Mark has only passed 296 once in his career.
4Lo in a SP is a huge risk if you aren't Makar Ignatov. I think he focuses on restoring 4F.So, just adding a 4Lo there would compensate
I think it's possible to build a good program around 5 quads
Petr wasn't clean at Nats. Zhenya did literally everything he could. There were no "some mistakes". He still lost with a gap.
If you have performance with four quads, then another one doesn't bury it. But for this, the program pattern must be built around the quads. If your program was choreographed for a different layout, you'll have to redo everything, and your performance will suffer. I remember when Zhenya was just starting to try three quads, and there was nothing left of the program.Maybe, but such a thing is yet to be seenAnd honestly, I think its likelihood is around the same level as purple unicors'
![]()
Petr was getting much more points before this season as well. He didn't win before because he had bad skates at Nats. And he's not the only competitor for Zhenya. I've mentioned at least two other skaters. I don't think Zhenya wants to perform with BV much less than everyone else and hope for a cacti fest.But that wasn't because of jumps or BV, but due to Petr's massive overscoring.
Zhenya started attempting 5 quads way before this event. This layout is still not ready due to various problems, including a knee injury at the beginning of the season.I understand what Zhenya tried to do, send a message for next season that he is not going down without a fight to the bitter end
Mark doesn't really get more PCS. They both skated clean FS at Nats and Semenenko scored higher. Smenenko's best SP this season was 44.44 and Mark's was 44.04. I don't think slightly cleaner Lutz will give him +1. Semenenko deserved the higher PCS this season across both programs and he got it. The BV gap is 4 across both programs. That would easily be compensated for by just replacing quads with higher value ones instead of forcing in an entire new one. If Lo is a risk in SP then he can do the 4F. But, with 5 quads he is going to be losing a lot on stamina anyways, small imperfections in execution or weak steps, if he isn't in perfect shape. Nevermind the risk of just flopping. Also, I'm not sure why not look at results across an entire career. It definitely matters. If Mark is inconsistent and only has 4BV on a consistent Semenenko, then Semenenko has no reason to force an entire extra quad which could ruin his event, instead of just upgrading his current, keeping his PCS high and perfecting his spins/combos. If he does this Mark simply wont be close. Mark would need a miracle skate and Semenenko would need to bomb which would make him lose regardless. I can't imagine forcing a quad won't dump his PCS and other marks. I think the BV would actually be higher total with first option plus other bonuses.If Mark had a better SP at Nats he would be above. He gets higher PCS and his BV is clearly higher. I don't think Zhenya wants just to rely on mistakes from other skaters.
4Lo in a SP is a huge risk if you aren't Makar Ignatov. I think he focuses on restoring 4F.
I hope we get a thread on this event soonI am not huge on show programs, but I'll watch the mega-gala competition when it happens to have the season closure.
Looks like it's this weekend, yay!I hope we get a thread on this event soon