- Joined
- Jan 31, 2019
No, intelligence correctly identified flag as Hungarian and calculates the bias as Hungarian. Somewhere in the entry table, someone put India. The official protocols only have ISU on them, so the entry had to be manual at some point.I doubt Soos is registered with the Indian federation. The intelligence just confused their flags, I suspect
![]()
Also, if we are going to be serious about recommendations : why not simply not allow judges who have been suspended previously from returning to Olympics judging ? Salomé wouldn't be a factor here if the ISU simply didn't allow formerly suspended judges to serve at worlds/olympics.
A quick analysis of protocols like that before final results are announced have to be a must and it should be transparent. We need to recieve official slip like that to show that results are not overall impacted, even if a judge was completely out of line. They also absolutely SHOULD gray out outliers in protocols if they are not used in calculations, period.
They could determine if it was conspiracy or stupidity on behalf of a judge later. French judge, Georgian judge and American judge should all have some kind of performance review. But the main thing, it has to be clear and transparent what they did.
Last edited:
