Should we also negate this accomplishment because of the new code of points, where a "perfect score" is now impossible? Oh heck, while we're at it, lets take away Michelle's accomplishments too, those 35 6.0's don't mean anything anymore, right?
I have no idea what this is all about.
My whole point was that Yagudin has so many credits to his name as it is, that there is no need to start making things up just to make him look good.
The quote clearly made it seem like he was the only skater to win Euros, Olys and worlds in the same season, and it's simply not true.
If they meant GPF, Olys and worlds, well then Kulik was his only competition and the guy didn't go to worlds, so it's not like Yagudin suceeded at something Kulik failed at.
Comparing it to 6.0s is silly, IMHO, as the 6.0 system has been in place for decades, possibly even a century. With the 6.0 comparison, Yagudin is up against anywhere from 10 to 20 guys. With the GPF comparison, it's just him against Kulik. In other words, having the highest grade in my class of 100 students was a major acomplishment. Having higher grades than just my one brother, not so spectacular.
Why poor MK was dragged into this, I'll never know.
If you think that I was trying to put down Yagudin and/or that I don't like him you're completely wrong.
If you think that I was somehow insulted by an MK dig because I'm some sort of crazed fan, well, wrong again.
I was just getting a chuckle out of the seemingly endless mistakes that skating journalists seem to make. Is research really that hard?