- Joined
- Jul 26, 2003
Except, of course, for 1969Joesitz said:The Mets usually come on strong in the beginning of the season and end with a whimper.
Joe
Except, of course, for 1969Joesitz said:The Mets usually come on strong in the beginning of the season and end with a whimper.
Joe
Ugh! I'm getting awfully tired of the entire COP system and its effect on skaters and their programs being evaluated based on what happened at '05 Worlds. The COP has been used for two seasons for the entire GPS/Final in all disciplines. I can only speak for myself, but during these pst two GPS seasons I've seen some glorious "heart and soul" skates and beautifully choreographed programs in the ladies discipline.Mathman said:This is what I meant. By "skating all out," IMHO this means putting your heart and soul into it. This has been Michelle's trademark throughout her career.
By "skating for the CoP," to me that means skating with one eye of the rule book and the other on your calculator.
Many of the ladies' performances at Worlds seemed to me to be of the second kind. Even Michelle's. Although her program was not successful, I do think that she allowed herself to worry about how many points she was accruing, and I think that this played with her mind and prevented her from "skating all out."
From everything I have read about the Marshall's performance, Michelle skated with greater abandon, greater freedom and greater joy than she did at Worlds.
IMHO it would be harmful to the sport if the new judging system turned out to reward and encourage mechanical connect-the-dots programs, with elements strung together to garner more points, but at the expense of the artistic integrity of the program as a whole. (I know you don't like double-talk about artistic integrity and skating from the heart, but that's my opinion nonetheless.)
Anyway, we'll have to wait and see. At the Marshall's event, did Michelle "skate all out," or did she merely stand more jumps than her competitors in an otherwise boring competition? Did the audience go away thinking they got their money's worth, or were they disappointed?
Mathman
PS. Interestingly, the new judging system seems to be having the opposite effect on men's skating. The men seem to be saying, "Yay, I don't have to do a quad any more, so now I can concentrate on developing my choreography and musical expression. (Buttle, Lysacek and Weir, for instance).
But at Marshall's, Weir tried a quad!
Finally, it seems to me that some people are evaluating the entire COP system based on what Michelle and Sasha did at Worlds. Now, now, you know who you are, you naughty fans, you. Seriously, of course I would hate it if skating turned into a mechanical ticking off of elements to get so many points. Throughout Michelle's career, because it has been such an astounding and historic one, many fans tend to hang on her every word as gospel. If Michelle says, in so many words, the COP did not allow her to skate the way the music told her to skate and thus she could not skate passionately but rather had to think about every element, I think a lot of people feel the problem is with the COP.
And as I've predicted before, Michelle will win the OGM to complete her Olympic medal collection.
Hey Red Dog,Red Dog said:But MK has developed and had HER best moments with the 6.0 system, so her reluctance to enter the new system is understandable (but necessary if she hopes to win the olys). Frankly, if she HAD won the olys and continued, I think she would have retired as soon as Cop came out.
I wonder about the young skaters who will develop under the Cop. Will they have their moments of glory as well? You bet.....
I think the reason for that impression on this thread is that this is the thrust of the article that occasioned the first post. It is all about how comfortable Michelle felt at Marshall's, etc., and what Sasha thought about it, etc., etc., etc.Rgirl said:My main point, admittedly lost in my typically digression-filled writing, was that I was growing rather tired of so many poster evaluating the merits of the COP based solely on what Michelle and Sasha did at '05 Worlds.
I just did a Google search for "Throw a cat out ugly." In all of the eight billion web pages in Google's data base, there is not a single instance of these five words written together. (Maybe eventually Google will get arround to reading this page, LOL. But you will be pleased to know that "Beaver Cleaver Sasha Cohen" returned 122 references.)My point This is my metaphor for life: If life is a cat and you throw it out ugly, there's no telling how it's going to come down.
Or see both of Johnny Weir's, Jeffrey Buttle's, Stephane Lindemann's, or Stephane Lambiel's SP's and LP's from 2003-5, or Viktor Pfeifer's or Kristoffer Berntsson's 2005 SP's, or Brian Joubert's Time SP, or Arakawa's Turandot LP and Madama Butterfly SP, Cohen's Malaguena and Dark Eyes SP's, the last three SP's by Totmianina/Marinin and Petrova/Tikhonov, Savchenko/Szolchowy's Casablanca, Denkova/Staviyski's 2004 FD, Delobel/Schoenfelder's Frida, just to skim the surface.Joesitz said:If you love artistic skating, see SOI.
Wasn't it ever?Joesitz said:btw, Wagner's edited Swan Lake was exquisitely skated in Dortumd QR.
hockeyfan228 said:Or see both of Johnny Weir's, Jeffrey Buttle's, Stephane Lindemann's, or Stephane Lambiel's SP's and LP's from 2003-5, or Viktor Pfeifer's or Kristoffer Berntsson's 2005 SP's, or Brian Joubert's Time SP, or Arakawa's Turandot LP and Madama Butterfly SP, Cohen's Malaguena and Dark Eyes SP's, the last three SP's by Totmianina/Marinin and Petrova/Tikhonov, Savchenko/Szolchowy's Casablanca, Denkova/Staviyski's 2004 FD, Delobel/Schoenfelder's Frida, just to skim the surface.
Cianni - That's ideal. All the elements in sync with the music and lots of flow over the ice (flow is what skating is all about; the tricks are just add ons).cianni said:Joesitz, I want to see both and thats not happening. I dont see Bielmans every other move and waving arms or look how fast I can spin in the same program with falls, two footed jumps , hands down ,wonky landings on jumps, traveling spins and all the other flawed skating COP has given us. I see no reason for the skaters to improve when a good spin as an example will allow a two footed jump or fall or whatever else to not make a difference. I want a balanced program with quality skating like no fallls,hands down, etc. I agree it is a sport and should be judges as such.