In Athletics, the whole "clean" athletes was more like a farce, wasn´t it?
You were only allowed to go, if you did not practice and reside in Russia. What if, the IOC demands this as well? If they truly believe RUSADA is bad and did not test properly, then the consequence would be that all tests by RUSADA have no value and therefore, no clean athlete would exist in Russia, as the tests there, are based on RUSADA.
At least this was the argumentation in Athletics and in the end, just two athletes did compete.
No doping test, is handed as having doped... The ISU is testing a lot, so do other federations, but if this will be sufficent?
This is an excellent question that the independent committee that will determine who will be invited to the Olympics has to answer.
RUSADA may have done some good and bad work but all of its work was compromised so we do not know what is good and what is bad. Basically the RUSADA evidence is questionable so athletes will need other means of proving they are clean.
However, sports federations have known for a while about these issues so hopefully a good number of athletes have been tested through other independent means.