If WADA's lab had returned the result within 20 days as they are obliged to do, then Valieva would not have competed.
I'm sure there are plenty of athletes at these games with samples that have not been tested, it would be so unfair for them to get the point of making an Olympics but have to withdraw because a lab can't do its job.
Only 1% or less samples ever test positive, plus figure skating is a sport where there are generally less use of performance enhancing drugs.
So Valieva should have been withdrawn from the team event at the last moment because of a 1 in 100 or even 1 in 200 chance of there being a problem with her sample?
Not to mention that athletes in the past who have competed in events with a sample outstanding that was later found to be positive, have not had the results from those events annulled. Valieva was chosen in good faith.
The composition of the team wasn’t established till the last possible moment with Russians sitting on it. The fact that the test was so late while the lab refined the technique specifically to avoid the false positive for the substance should have been a red flag. I am sure it was, that's why Russians delayed announcement of team composition to the point of traumatizing the team members who sat late into the night waiting to find out who skates.
There was nothing in the documents that indicated communication from the lab to the RusFed about the first detection and the second and third round of technique refinement retesting they did to zero in on the peak on the chromatogram they needed to read without any ambiguity. Doing anything else would have been negligence. I do not know the protocol for it and there was no email chains or whatever about it that I had seen. If the lab was supposed to notify about potential positive and didn’t, then yes, blame the lab. If they didn't have to communicate until final result was in, or if they did communicate and Russians ignored it, in these cases, the lab didn't break the rules.
Lab's TAT is not an obligation, unless they paid for rush, it is an estimate how long the anaytical takes. As long as the sample is not compromised in storage or chain of custody is interupted, time over usual TAT is not a breach of any rules or protocols. It's been a while, but iirc the lab was within TAT actually, just on the higher end of the range.I am someone who dealt and deals with lab data and labs for over twenty years, so yeah, I know this shit.
If I was RusFed and had two stellar skaters with all their tests back and clean, and one with an outstanding and inexplicably--or, indeed, explicably--delayed I would have never ever risked putting Valieva into team event. It's a virtual no-brainer.
Other countries who only have one athlete to put in, that's a justifiable risk. In Russian situation it was so unjustified, it bordered on gross negligence and sheer, outright avos' stupidity.
So, bronze is a generous consolation prize.