- Joined
- May 5, 2018
No. The situations are not equivalent. The guy is the married one. He is the one who made vows to someone else. He is the one who has to have responsibility *by law* towards his family. He is the one who made the commitment.I'm sorry as yet if you said the married man have to set boundaries just because he's a married man then Kana should do the same as well.
Kana is not married. She can associate with whoever she wants - as long as the person is not a minor. Is it ideal to associate with a married person? No. More often than not, that's a mistake. But the reality is, the person who's married is the cheater, not the person who's unmarried.
There is a big difference in responsibility between being married and unmarried, and although the unmarried party might have made a mistake, the brunt of the responsibility should be on the married party.