(M): Regarding PCS, we have a question about Mihara Mai. They ask us if Mihara Mai wasn’t judged too harshly, considering Tursynbaeva’s scores.
They both skated two clean programs; we’ve come to expect that from Mihara, not for Tursynbaeva, who finally went over 200 points for the first time. It’s not easy to compare, but it is quite incomprehensible how Mihara was judged, because in my opinion, her FP is one of the best in terms of CO this season, and there are many TR. She probably doesn’t [connect with] the judges [in her performance], which is an explanation that disturbs me, because I hate this kind of thinking, but it’s the only one I have.
(A): Yes, it happens, and it has already happened in the past: we saw skaters who struggled to get in the judges’ favour and their scores puzzled the fans. Which is probably what is happening to Mihara Mai. But I agree that isn’t easy to understand why her scores are so low, considering what she does on the ice – if compared to the others, but also in general. We should consider that every skater should be analyzed on their own, which is impossible, but it’s what this new system was meant to do. But even if we consider that, I think she’s quite underrated, she isn’t the first and won’t be the last but…
(M): And it frequently happens with the Japanese ladies. Miyahara for example; she struggled a lot to get higher PCS. The only explanation we ever came up with was that the judges didn’t give her high scores because they saw her as someone who didn’t fill the rink. Her PCS improved with time, she improved as a skater as well – then she started to do that 2+7 in the FP and she got higher PCS.