- Joined
- Jan 25, 2013
Not having the open body positions at the start and end of the jump ARE the lacking phases. Malinin does indeed lack them in the jump, his "faster rotation" is a direct removal of those qualities.
It is not "necessary" to do this to fit in the extra rotation. 4A could be done with the more open and explosive technique. Like I said, it would require more speed going in, and would be incredibly difficult to land. To the point that probably nobody would do it successfully.
But that is what should be expected in a jump. We shouldn't be clamoring to reward rotation for the sake of it, with a blind eye to everything else. The jump should first be a jump, with the expected qualities that make it look complete. If people are not able to do that, then the jump simply can not be done properly. 3A did not lack these qualities when people brought it into the sport. It had the same apparent phases as the 2A, with the rotations in the air being fully visible.
So while his 4A can technically be recognized, it should not receive bonus GOE when done like this. If anything, the one Malinin did should be -1 GOE because of lacking speed on the landing and needing to put the free foot down shortly afterward.
Samarin definitely has a better 4Lz than quite a few others, not sure why you're trying to go after that jump. His 4Lz is not one of the most renowned, Boyang Jin's is the type that gets bigger reactions, exactly because of its massive amplitude, speed, and total completeness of rotation.
They are not bogus, you're just bad at assessing these things like usual. He has not already left the ice in the second picture shown. His toepick can be clearly seen in the ice, that is the takeoff point.
Here is a very clear full shot that shows his skate in relation to the side board (which is where the takeoff started); he is past the point of perpendicular:
![]()
No, the first picture is showing where he's about to start taking off. His free foot starts swinging forward right after that point. Obviously this should be understood.
The point being, he's clearly not starting the take off at some point beyond where his skate is facing the side board. I already anticipated some people might try to claim his foot is starting past the side board, when that is not case.
Okay. Well see what you see hun. Definitely write a letter to the ISU to revoke the ratified jump, just like Sotnikova’s 3Z+3T you definitely have a case and they will definitely listen to your grievances.
I would also like to point out that his quad axel at Slate America should adhere to your guidelines and have been called <<… and -5 GOE. Also very overscored on PCS. Should be 60 maximum.
There, happy?
