- Joined
- Aug 8, 2009
The country sponsored fed vs. non-sponsored - formally there is difference. But it happens that the U.S. track-n-field fed and individual athletes have much more private funding than the fed in Russia which has to rely on the government money. It does not mean that the government is fully aware of the details. But even if they are. For example they see Florence Griffit-Jones who was around for quite a while - her first WC was in 1983. In all the years before 1988 she only twice ran 100m faster than 11 sec: 10,99 and 10,96. Then in 1988 she is visually much more muscular. And she delivers: 10.89, 10.99, 10.60, 10.49,10.70, 10.61, 10.62, 10.88, 10.70, 10.54, 10.91 - all in 1 year! She is 29 then. Next year she retires - in 8 years she dies. She has not been caught. But with all due respect do we believe her being clean? Especially knowing that her husband - another athlete was not? And if not, who knew and what does it have to do whether it was or not on the government money? And if in Russia they see that the name of the game is not to be clean but not to be caught, the temptation is too high as sports is a lot about politics. And some do think that it is better to be an uncaught dirty winner than a clean loser.
I do not justify the doping use - I just see this particular media hysteria as a part of driven by Ukraine situation push to further isolate Russia pretending she is the only black sheep in the herd.
The examples you cited are American athletes who were competing in the 1980's and early-1990's. I'm sure doping still takes place in the United States quite alot, but certainly not on the grand scale that it appears to occur in Russia. Russia, I think, is especially black here, no?