- Joined
- May 4, 2013
Ashley definitely wanted to do a 3-3 combination, she just had to re-evaluate after her landing of the first jump. She lost a lot of speed due to leaning forwards a lot on the landing of that triple Flip, and also a little lack of rotation. With that kind of speed, only very secure 3-3 jumpers could have continued with a clean triple Toeloop. She's often been penalized for underrotating the triple Toeloop even when everything goes smoothly between the 2 jumps, so she certainly made the right call, as it would have been a dangerous mess otherwise!Ashley -- although I agree she is a long shot even for a bronze on the world/Olympic stage, still I do think she put out a nice, mature, well-rounded program. I actually didn't think, watching the opening combo, that she was electing from the start to do a triple-double. To me it looked like the first jump almost went out of control and she was scrambling a bit to tack on the second jump. But my technical knowledge is pretty minimal compared to lots on this board, so I dunno.

In the Kiss and Cry, she apologized to the camera "triple-triple: next time!" and teased her coach "aren't you glad I didn't go for a triple after that landing, huh?"
Funny about your observations regarding Rachael Flatt: It's the opposite for me!Flatt -- wow, it is fascinating to me to see Flatt garnering so much praise on the forums given responses to her as she was declining in her performances a few seasons ago. It's quite ironic for me because I am not nearly the fan of hers that I was before she divided her time between skating and school. When she was competing full time on the senior circuit, I really thought she was underappreciated because of her style and body type and so forth. I wasn't in the camp that felt she was hugely overscored at the 2010 Nats over Mirai -- I liked her athletic style and thought it was different from Mirai's elegance but not less appealing. And the mystery UR calls in Vancouver were questionable, I thought. But when she decided on full time schooling in such an intensive way, basically dividing her loyalties and energies, as a fan, I lost interest in her. I think it's fine if she wants to putz around at a few comps and stutter into Nationals, but can't imagine why. If she wants to skate for the love of skating there are other venues for that. For me, again just subjective reactions and the fun of analyzing athletic performances like fans of any other sport -- YAWN. If you want to be an international caliber skater, give it your heart. If not, there are plenty of other venues. Regardless, though, it is nice to see her getting praise on the forums for what she is doing. I'm not wanting to see her vilified or anything, I just don't have any fan-dom invested in her any more. But she was roundly criticized on the forums just a few seasons ago, so ... interesting.
I was never a fan of her (style, jumping technique, I felt she was overscored) when she was at the top of her game, but after those rough years and the criticism she's gotten, I just admire her for keeping on doing what she's doing. All the while studying at Stanford! Stanford!
It seems to be considered the "honorable thing to do" for athletes to retire and never show the lower level they have after a few years. She just said "I still enjoy skating, and the competition!", despite many many people who must have told her not to persevere. So I say "good for her!" :thumbsup: She fought through regionals to qualify for these US Nationals, so she deserved to be there. One more nice memory for her...
So I'd say my appreciation for her as a person has grown while your appreciation for her as an athlete has decreased!


