I've felt this way for several years now as a fan, but if the judges really applied the rules they already have it would clear up a lot of problems that the scoring system seems to suffer from.
Unfortunately, in each competition, you see that some rules are enforced more than others or enforced unevenly. If this is not addressed, it doesn't matter what changes the ISU makes to programs, the scoring system or anything.
Skaters get the idea that you have to appeal to the judges by this or that gimmick, be it boring music choices, incorporating difficult jumps that they are not ready for, or tons of transitions of poor quality, etc. etc.
Having a techincal and artistic program separate will only exacerbate this problem imo.
I'm a big fan of skaters who are artists, and skaters who have some amazing technical abilities. These things can exist together, if they are scored correctly. 'Artistry is built upon absolute technical prowess' as Yuzuru Hanyu said when asked about this dichotomy.
Will the artistic program be a lot of rolling or sliding on the ice or standing in one place dancing/ posing? If so, no thanks.
Will the technical program be telegraphing a 4Lutz the length of the rink, and then doing 100 meaningless transitions in quick succession without music? If so, no thanks.
For those who like this idea, and think I'm being too doom and gloom, (I admit, I can be grumpy about change) please do chime in with what you think would be a good way to present an artistic and technical program separately.
That's my skating rant for the day.