Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think we should just let the judges have a mudfight. The idea that judges are fragile little flowers who cower in fear of Ms. Shekhovtsova. What would she threaten them with? "I vill beat you up"?
In all seriousness, is it possible to have some consensus, after some 200 pages of discussion? Let's start with the basics. We will get to the individual elements and details (including the SP performances, and other skaters' performances/scores as well), but it would be great if we can settle a few things first.
Here, we have a clip that compares Yuna and Adelina's FS. For overall skating, I want you to ask yourselves the followings;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8NIHBJBAqU
- Who has a better flow?
- Who is more comfortable on the ice?
- Who is more sure-footed during the performance?
- Who skates with two feet more?
- Who skates faster?
- Who skates to music?
- Who skates with more ice coverage?
- Who skates more effortlessly?
- Who skates more gracefully? (carriage, style, lines, etc.)
Try answering each question. Copy/paste the questions next to your answer if necessary. Some may feel Q.9 to be rather subjective than the first 8 questions. It's up to you whether to ignore that question. I believe the rest of the questions can be answered in a fairly objective manner.
I chose those questions because those (supposedly) reflect the criteria of PCS. I wanted to know where everyone's opinion is on those criteria. You can add your own questions to my list.
I do not expect everyone to have the same opinion.
@Anna K.: I am listening. I think "consensus" might have been a wrong choice of word, at least not until there is clear leanings. I changed my post to reflect your wisdom.
Seriously...who doesn't like Yuna? That's like not liking puppies!!
http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/puppies-and-more/images/31104113/title/cute-puppies-wallpaper
Presentation Score
In addition to the Technical Score, the Judges will award points on a scale from 0.25 to 10.00 with increments of 0.25 for the Presentation Score to grade the overall presentation of the performance.
The Presentation Score is for Single and Pair Skating (Short Program and Free Skating):
- Skating Skills; which is the overall quality of the skating ability (e.g. balance, flow, multi directional skating, power)
- Transitions, Linking Footwork and Movement; which is the variety and difficulty how the individual elements are linked together. Unison in Pair Skating and Ice Dance as well as the balance of workload of both partners.
- Performance/Execution; is the physical and emotional involvement of the skater/couple as they translate the intent of the music and choreography (e.g. carriage, style, personality, variety, contrasts, projection)
- Choreography/Composition; which is the arrangement of all movements according to the principles of proportion, space and music (e.g. idea, concept, unity, pattern, phrasing, originality, design)
- Interpretation; which is the translation of the music to movement on ice (e.g. timing, expression of the music, use of nuances, relationship between partners, character of music)
- Who has a better flow?
- Who is more comfortable on the ice?
- Who is more sure-footed during the performance?
- Who skates with two feet more?
- Who skates faster?
- Who skates to music?
- Who skates with more ice coverage?
- Who skates more effortlessly?
- Who skates more gracefully? (carriage, style, lines, etc.)
- Whose skate has more intricate linking elements?
- Whose skate has more personality and/or originality?
- Whose skate excites the audience more?
- Performance/Execution; is the physical and emotional involvement of the skater/couple as they translate the intent of the music and choreography (e.g. carriage, style, personality, variety, contrasts, projection)
- Choreography/Composition; which is the arrangement of all movements according to the principles of proportion, space and music (e.g. idea, concept, unity, pattern, phrasing, originality, design)
- Interpretation; which is the translation of the music to movement on ice (e.g. timing, expression of the music, use of nuances, relationship between partners, character of music)
As far as scoring is concerned, it begs the question "if a tree falls in the forest, and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?" (ie, if a skater sells their program to the max, and the crowd doesn't care, does it mean they were not projecting?) I learn toward not letting the audience be the judge of that :sarcasm: Or rather, not letting the number of decibels in the arena dictate the score for this component. The judges are also part of the audience, but they don't have the freedom to be partisan. Unlike the spectators, they also have the expertise to determine the performance value of a skate.I♥Yuna;885127 said:Who has a better flow? Yuna
Who is more comfortable on the ice? Caro
Who is more sure-footed during the performance? Yuna
Who skates with two feet more? Not sure, but Adelina's choreo stands out to me more than the others in this respect
Who skates faster? If we're debating top 3 as usual, I think Caro edges out Yuna. Adelina is understandably slower because of the extra choreography
Who skates to music? Yuna and Caro both have good musicality, but Yuna's musical choice was more ambitious and she performed with exactitude (Bolero's monotonous beat is much easier to hold onto). Adelina - not sure. I want to see her sp again, b/c I think her timing was better in that one, than in Capriccioso (then again, it was not unlike Bolero in terms of the easy rhythm...)
Who skates with more ice coverage? Need to rewatch the fancams, but I think Yuna and Caro utilized the most space.
Who skates more effortlessly? Yuna
Who skates more gracefully? (carriage, style, lines, etc.) Yuna doesn't have perfect lines, but she moves like a stream of water. Carolina's lines are better, and she is very graceful too, but the telegraphing can be disruptive (style), whereas Yuna's delivery of the choreo & jumps is pretty much seamless. Adelina is not naturally graceful (carriage, style), but she does have beautiful lines.
Whose skate has more intricate linking elements? Adelina (although it was sloppy, so score-wise I feel it's worth the same as doing less, but w/better quality)
Whose skate has more personality and/or originality? Caro's checked both boxes. Adelina's choreo was original, though I didn't care for the aesthetic. I though it had personality for the last 1/3 of the way, but the opening 2/3 was kind of empty. I felt Yuna's was infused with personality and variety, but it was more understated than Caro's.
Whose skate excites the audience more? Adelina (see below ^*^)
Some of that doesn't sound right to me :think: Like I think they should judge performance and execution separately, because of the "passionless robot" thing (perfect execution, but no performance value, and you can also have the opposite). I also don't get why they pair choreography with composition, instead of interpretation??? Methinks it should be more like this:
- Performance - the emotional involvement as they translate the intent of the music (personality, projection^*^, and variety).
- Choreography - the interpretation of the music into movement (e.g. timing, expression of the music, use of nuances, relationship between partners, character of music).
- Execution - the physical involvement as they communicate* their choreography (carriage, style, and contrasts).
- Composition - the arrangement of all movements according to the principles of proportion, space and music (e.g. design, phrasing, idea, concept, unity, originality, pattern, and ice coverage**).
^*^Adelina & Yulia's reception in Sochi really makes me think, and tbh, I'm kind of torn about whether the crowd's reaction should factor into this aspect, because the crowd usually cheers for the jumps and spins, which have nothing to do with projection, and most of the time they do so out of simple politeness. The only time you can tell if they are really "buying" the performance that the skater is selling is if they clap along for a step sequence or a dramatic element like a spiral or a unique piece of choreography. Sometimes you can tell because of the skater's ability to silence the crowd, like that moment in Kwan's Salome where she freezes and creates this tension in the air with the music - you could hear a pin drop. She had everyone invested in those last few seconds of the program. That's projection. Same with Baiul's exhibition in Lillihammer - rapt attention - they didn't even clap for her last spin. She had them all under her spell. Then again, there are times like at this Olympics with Wagner, where the skater has amazing projection, but the crowd is totally dead. It kind of reminded me of this time when my dance company was invited to perform at a juvenile detention center lol. We did a tap number to 40s swing medley that we had been practicing all year. We had it down, and we went full out, in-character, full-costumes, etc. The kids just stared at us like they were bored out of their mindsAs far as scoring is concerned, it begs the question "if a tree falls in the forest, and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?" (ie, if a skater sells their program to the max, and the crowd doesn't care, does it mean they were not projecting?) I learn toward not letting the audience be the judge of that :sarcasm: Or rather, not letting the number of decibels in the arena dictate the score for this component. The judges are also part of the audience, but they don't have the freedom to be partisan. Unlike the spectators, they also have the expertise to determine the performance value of a skate.
*choice of word: my dance teacher used to liken dance to language & sometimes compared it to sign language (so executing a piece of choreography = "communication").
**added that because I think area coverage has to do with the "principles of space" and "arrangement of all movements" (how you choose to utilize the space during the alotted time).
I don't think you can accurately judge ANY crowd reaction at Sochi
My intended answers are strictly either 1) Adelina or 2) Yuna.
Even my 3-year old knows machines can't translate. But by all means, feel free to stick with the word salad your "translation softwares" spit out and justify the lies people tell to suit their agendas. Enjoy your sheepskin lutzes.I guess there's have no choice but to take your word for it, contrary to running the translation through multiple translation softwares in different languages so no wonder people reacted the way they did. How interesting then Tat need to bring up the costumes and putting herself forward as some sort of spokeswoman for what the judges think. These facts alone says a lot. Sotnikova's Carmen is a superior program to Send in the clown, especially interpretation???![]()
If someone has a 3-way comparison video, I would love to see it, though, and we can probably answer the questions with all 3 of them as options. But for this video and the questions, my intended answers are strictly either 1) Adelina or 2) Yuna.