- Joined
- Feb 17, 2010
Again, it was her best performance but it was not perfect, it was not flawless. She had mistakes that weren't called as what have been discussed here OVER AND OVER AGAIN.
SO what? This isn't 6.0. You don't have to be clean to have the highest scoring program. You don't have to be the most graceful. You don't even have to be the best at everything. You just have to accrue the most points. Kim's strategy was to accrue the points mainly on jumps and artistry. Adelina's was jumps, spins, and more complex choreography. Both were good strategies as they netted the skaters great scores.
As far as the rising scores, the judges had direct comparison of the skaters. Is it fair for a judge to give Caro 142 and then if they feel Adelina skated better to give her a score lower solely on the fact that in the past she hasn't scored as high. That is silly. If you have the three skaters in front of you, you judge them based on what they presented in front of you, not how they have been scored in the past. Why even have a competition if you are only going to score in ranges based on past results? If someone wins the night they need to be awarded the score they earned.
Just making a point, not disagreeing w/ your basic premise at all!
to them. The thing is the NFL for example is one of the largest corporations in America and acts as a representation of American culture in many ways. The fact that we not only shower convicted felons with money and even hold them up as examples for our children is sickening to me. Hockey is the only sport outside of FS I follow and while I feel they both have infinitely higher standards I still find myself
quite often.