There’s no such thing as a figure skating body | Golden Skate

There’s no such thing as a figure skating body

moonvine

All Hail Queen Gracie
Record Breaker
Joined
Mar 14, 2007
Now, this was against fat-shaming and the like, but for Single Men, there is such thing as a Quad body, it seems to depend on the angle between the spine and the coccyx and it's of course genetic. Great skaters who have a rather bent coccyx, as far as we know, can't jump Quadruple Jumps, and I would say that they may endure Quad-shaming?
 
Now, this was against fat-shaming and the like, but for Single Men, there is such thing as a Quad body, it seems to depend on the angle between the spine and the coccyx and it's of course genetic. Great skaters who have a rather bent coccyx, as far as we know, can't jump Quadruple Jumps, and I would say that they may endure Quad-shaming?
But you don't need to jump quads to be a figure skater.

I think most people agree there is such a thing as a world champion figure skating body, generally speaking.
 
Poor Natalie. Happy she can talk about it now (even with a little understandable hiccup in the beginning), and wishes to share. It reminds me of Kaitlin Hawayek some years ago who was body shamed as well, and also spoke out. Not much has changed it seems.
 
I love this message. Especially with all the EDs in our sport.




I like the message.

For me: if you love it, go for it.

This topic is one of problems in figure skating.

It is true that bigger, taller, more heavy body CAN have more problems to rotate difficult jumps (speaking about single skaters) and the movements across the ice may not look that effortless.

BUT thin body type should not be a duty which would lead to attacks on skaters who doesn't have such body type.

For example coming to ladies and triple jumps it is so individual ON THE FIRST PLACE. Because it is body type VERSUS strenght of legs and core VERSUS hardwork VERSUS great jumping technique / technique of rotation. And all of this together decides if the lady will land triples.

In past decade ladies figure skating presented women of all range of height and weight.

From Satoko Miyahara with 152cm to Sofia Samodelkina and Lara Naki Gutmann having 170cm, to Lorine Schild having 173cm (info based on Google). Range of weight could be from 40 kilograms (some Japanese ladies, Chaeon- Kim) to Mae Berenice Meite with 69 kilograms.
Such range of both height and weight shows clearly that there are different body types.
Thin skaters, muscular skaters, we saw all of these.
All ladies are / were landing triples.
All ladies are / were executing Level 4 spins.
As to quality of Skating Skills and Step Sequences, I see no relevance to weight / height.

Coming to detail, bigger muscle mass and smaller flexibility create troubles in some spin positions. But I hope that coaches are able to come with more suitable positions for each skater individually.
 
I think most people agree there is such a thing as a world champion figure skating body, generally speaking.
This is actually quite a tricky road to navigate. Figure skating is for everyone. go for it and God bless. So is basketball.

Still, if you aspire to be a star in the NBA, you have an advantage if you are tall. If sumo wrestling is your sport, the 200 kg guy will beat the smaller man.

Kristi Yamaguchi (5'0", 95 pounds) said in her autobiographical writings that what attracted her to figure skating was that it was the only sport (besides being a jockey) where being small is a plus rather than a minus.
 
This is actually quite a tricky road to navigate. Figure skating is for everyone. go for it and God bless. So is basketball.

Still, if you aspire to be a star in the NBA, you have an advantage if you are tall. If sumo wrestling is your sport, the 200 kg guy will beat the smaller man.

Kristi Yamaguchi (5'0", 95 pounds) said in her autobiographical writings that what attracted her to figure skating was that it was the only sport (besides being a jockey) where being small is a plus rather than a minus.
The NBA is a favourite example for those visualizing natural anthropomorphic restrictions on sport, though I notice greater anthropomorphic variance amongst elite ballers than elite male skaters. Quite significantly so. In male skating one notices a moderate variety regarding height yet otherwise they are all uncannily identical. If it wasn't for Memola the height too would be very restrictive (it realistically still is) compared to the general distribution (especially in Europe). Women's skating is more forgiving—relatively equally on height (maybe barely less forgiving) but significantly more on shape. These debates tend to consider women's body-image and corollary psychological effects—which is a separate topic—but I find the male field enormously more edifying regarding sports-science and statistical trends.

Male singles skating might be the most anthropomorphically restrictive sport in the world. Perhaps second only to Sumo Wrestling as you suggest.
 
I wouldn't go so far as to say there is A figure skating body. I think some body types lend themselves to more ease with certain movements. For example, obviously a smaller lady in pairs makes it easier for the man to throw her around like a sack of potatoes - gracefully, of course. I think men built with slim bodies probably have an easier time rotating with tight circles enabling them to do more revolutions. Hanyu and Nathan and Ilia, for example. and much as I hate to admit it - Daniel Grassl (who I always want to feed a hamburger) I just remember reading Johnny Weir's discussions about how he ate a tomato for dinner. He was never overweight and always on the slim size but he dieted to keep on the skinny side. I can easily see how this sport would lend itself to body image problems and eating disorders.
 
But you don't need to jump quads to be a figure skater.

I think most people agree there is such a thing as a world champion figure skating body, generally speaking.
I don't agree with that, at least not from a technical standpoint. Some (many?) skaters pursue an aesthetic ideal.
 
Back
Top