Yes indeed. Along with Great Britain and Australia. The US at first issued a statement supporting "the principles" of the WSF, but later said, oh, no, we don't support the organization, just it's principles.JOHIO2 said:Wasn't Japan one of the feds that was grumbling and flirting with World Fed?
*~RussianBleux~* said:Totmianina and Marinin are a lock for Olympic gold without Shen and Zhao competing? I honestly hope Shen and Zhao compete for this very reason. It's honestly no fun if you know who is going to win ahead of time. I honestly think Shen and Zhao deserve the OGM over Totmianina and Marinin, and I'm pretty sure that they will be the pair on top in Turin if they can go. Like I said above, I've never been a fan of Totmianina and Marinin or Petrova and Tikhonov, so I'm kind of rooting for any other pair besides the Russians in this Olympics. While I think that Shen and Zhao are a lock for the OGM, I still feel that a flawless Savchenko and Szowkoly could overtake a flawed Totmianina and Marinin and most certainly a flawed Petrova and Tikhonov as shown at Skate Canada. I'm glad you brought up the other two Chinese teams though as I had completely forgotten about them. This definitely changes things. I honestly have no idea if I would put money on Savchenko and Szowkoly beating either Chinese team, but the match up will be interesting to watch at the GPF(granted all teams qualify). I'll probably have formed an opinion by the time the GPF is over.
I can see your point now, although I'm not losing hope at their chances of a bronze medal, and MAYBE a silver(if Shen and Zhao don't go) if by some miracle they are able to compete in Turin. If not, then I will enjoy watching them in the future and will be looking forward to seeing them in 2010, along with other new pair teams on the scene, Marcy Hinzmann/Aaron Parchem and Anabelle Langlois/Cody Hay.
She did beat Cohen, didn't she....perhaps she does have a chance, but ONLY if Michelle and Sasha are both flawed. Judging by your screen name, you probably agree with me that Irina has this gold medal in the bag. The silver and bronze medal generally seem up in there air, although I have a hunch that regardless of Mao's performance(not that she could go), it would be Irina, Michelle, and Sasha on the podium in Turin. These three ladies seem to be the favorites and even though I've heard of Olympic surprises and upsets(think Sarah Hughes), I have no doubts that this will be the Olympic podium right now(of course we still have to see what happens in the GPF and US Nationals).
The next couple of months should be VERY interesting....
tripleflutz said:I think the JAPAN Federation is waiting to see which skaters they want to put on their Ladies team, since they have about a half dozen ladies that might be included. They probably wont make their decision until a few weeks before the Olympics starting date. But, If they decide that they want Mao to go, I dont see how the ISU can block her, since the Olympics are an IOC event and there aren't any IOC rules that would prohibit her from competing.
I think its OK for the ISU to set age restrictions for their own events(Worlds), but to bar Mao from an IOC event is going too far. If JAPAN wants to send her, and the ISU doesn't give in, I think the JAPAN Federation may challange the ISU in court. But, however it turns out, it could cause a rift between $peedy and the JAPAN Federation, and if there is a court ruling against the ISU allowing JAPAN to send Mao in spite of ISU opposition, it could weaken the ISU's position as sole lords and masters of figure skating as regards the Olympics. And that would be a VERY GOOD THING!!! Anything that would weaken the $peedy dominated ISU's death grip on the long suffering figure skating world, is good for figure skating.
Of course, Japan might chicken-out, but I hope that they decide to send Mao, and take on the ISU, I'd love to see $peedy taken down a notch or two.
chuckm said:If the JF wanted the rules changed, they should have started a campaign at least a year ago, so that the rule change could have been passed by the ISU council by last spring to be in effect for the Olympic season. But reality says that most of the federations would not have been in favor of a rule change, as only Japan and maybe South Korea would benefit from such a change.
Mao seems to have accepted waiting until 2010 to skate in the Olympics. She's smarter than her federation.
Hi, Masa, welcome to the forum and thanks for posting!masa said:I hear JF is going to propose Mao's participation in Olympic if she is on the podium at GPF.
mzheng said:Yes. Mao did beat Arakawa and Cohen. But this is still early in the season.
Through my observation, one obviouse difference between youngsters and 'older' ones in Figure Skating is the youngsters are able to maintain the about the same level (or their peak level) when the season goes on. They are 'fresh' out in the scene, they are hungry and they are highly motivated to 'show off'. There may not be big up and down in their performance through out the season.
But for 'older' ones (or rather more experienced ones) they need pacing themselves physically and emotionally (being in sports long enough sometimes can lost hungry and motivation periodically. It's like trying to do the same job day after day for a while you lost the interest, then you wait for new project came in get your interest back again.). It's very important for them to 'peak' at right time and right competetion.....IMO, Arakawa and Cohen are both pacing(throught unimportant competetions) themselves to the majore competetion.
Somewhat agree with the pacing idea, but Cohen should not be pacing like Arakawa, she is younger than Shizuka, and has not won anything HUGE like a world gold or olys medal yet.
ITA with the first part of your post, which folks can see in post #37 (just trying to save space). I also totally agree that it is important for skaters to peak at the right time. In fact, peaking at the right time is, IMO and experience, one of the very most important things for a skater.Mzheng said:.....But for 'older' ones (or rather more experienced ones) they need pacing themselves physically and emotionally (being in sports long enough sometimes can lost hungry and motivation periodically. It's like trying to do the same job day after day for a while you lost the interest, then you wait for new project came in get your interest back again.). It's very important for them to 'peak' at right time and right competetion.....IMO, Arakawa and Cohen are both pacing(throught unimportant competetions) themselves to the majore competetion.
BronzeisGolden said:I agree with this for the most part, but Cohen has dealt with the "favorite" pressure for a bit longer than Shizuka. Hardly anyone expected Shizuka to challenge for titles and medals in 2002 and even 2003. Her World victory in 2004 came as a shock to many. She has not returned to that form since (although I am seeing glimpses of it.....and I certianly hope she will) Cohen has captured many international titles and been in the "favorite" role ever since 2002. Shizuka has only been experiencing this fully since March of 2004 (and, honestly, more so as a World Champion).......so, I would say they are about equal where that is concerned. They both are incredibly talented and capable of winning titles, but pacing/focus/motivation seem to be key factors for both of these ladies.