Hi all, for a well-fitting skate, how much space above the toes is acceptable vs too much? And is a tiny fraction of heel movement doing little test hops (on land) ok as long as the heel goes nice and securely back with some knee bend?
For context, I'm trying to decide between Risport RF3 Pros and Royal Pros. I had tried the Royal Pros in store (240, they didn't have the RF3s in that size) and they felt good but maybe a bit of pressure across the top of the toes of the right foot, I also felt that maybe the ankle didn't feel very secure though the heel felt reasonably secure. I ordered the RF3 Pros in the same size from Skaters Edge NZ with whom I had done a virtual fitting and they had recommended RF3 Pros for better heel/ankle security (and said the little toe area could be heat molded/punched out, based on my feedback on RF3s 1 size up (245) squashing my little toes) The RF3s Pros in 245 had too much volume over the toes but I was hoping that one size down would fix that problem. The RF3 Pros in 240 arrived today and I feel like there may still be slightly too much space above the toes, especially on my left foot? I can wriggle it up/down a reasonable amount, though my little toes on both feet are quite squashed (the Royal Pros were far more comfortable in that regard). It's hard to tell just walking without a blade, but I worry that when skating I may feel like 'gripping' with my toes if there is too much space above? What does everyone think?
Also, I felt that the heel lock of the RF3 was similar to the Royal Pro and surprisingly the ankle was maybe only a little bit more secure. Though it's hard to go off memory since I don't have the Royal Pros with me for direct comparison, and it can vary with lacing tightness, etc. Given that, I'm wondering if it would make more sense to return the RF3s and get the Royal Pros instead? I suppose the risk of that would be if there is a difference in heel lock and after breaking in the Royal Pro doesn't hold the heel or ankle as well or if the volume ends up too low and doesn't expand with breaking in? There will be quite a bit in shipping and restocking fees if I return the RF3s, so just want to be as sure as possible if I do that!
I also have a general question about heel slippage, if the heel only moves a fraction when doing little test jumps (on land, no blades mounted) and then goes back securely with knee bend, is that about as secure as a heel can get? Or are we expecting absolutely zero movement? The virtual fitter said that the heel lock will be the tightest when the boot is new so it needs to be extremely secure to begin with but I'm not sure what actually counts as heel slippage.
(For more context, the store I tried the Risport at didn't have a very experienced fitter so hard to just go by their advice, in fact they only did length measurements and fit me into 245s at first. The virtual fitter recommended 240 and I went back and asked to try it on and found the 240 length did seem better, especially if it would expand while breaking in. The virtual fitter also recommended going down to B from C width (the store stocks C as standard so I was only able to try C on), but I already felt it was very snug so wasn't game enough to try too small and hope it widens with breaking in.)
Thanks in advance!
ETA minor wording correction as my original wording made it sound like the heel moved more than the tiny amount it did with the test hops
For context, I'm trying to decide between Risport RF3 Pros and Royal Pros. I had tried the Royal Pros in store (240, they didn't have the RF3s in that size) and they felt good but maybe a bit of pressure across the top of the toes of the right foot, I also felt that maybe the ankle didn't feel very secure though the heel felt reasonably secure. I ordered the RF3 Pros in the same size from Skaters Edge NZ with whom I had done a virtual fitting and they had recommended RF3 Pros for better heel/ankle security (and said the little toe area could be heat molded/punched out, based on my feedback on RF3s 1 size up (245) squashing my little toes) The RF3s Pros in 245 had too much volume over the toes but I was hoping that one size down would fix that problem. The RF3 Pros in 240 arrived today and I feel like there may still be slightly too much space above the toes, especially on my left foot? I can wriggle it up/down a reasonable amount, though my little toes on both feet are quite squashed (the Royal Pros were far more comfortable in that regard). It's hard to tell just walking without a blade, but I worry that when skating I may feel like 'gripping' with my toes if there is too much space above? What does everyone think?
Also, I felt that the heel lock of the RF3 was similar to the Royal Pro and surprisingly the ankle was maybe only a little bit more secure. Though it's hard to go off memory since I don't have the Royal Pros with me for direct comparison, and it can vary with lacing tightness, etc. Given that, I'm wondering if it would make more sense to return the RF3s and get the Royal Pros instead? I suppose the risk of that would be if there is a difference in heel lock and after breaking in the Royal Pro doesn't hold the heel or ankle as well or if the volume ends up too low and doesn't expand with breaking in? There will be quite a bit in shipping and restocking fees if I return the RF3s, so just want to be as sure as possible if I do that!
I also have a general question about heel slippage, if the heel only moves a fraction when doing little test jumps (on land, no blades mounted) and then goes back securely with knee bend, is that about as secure as a heel can get? Or are we expecting absolutely zero movement? The virtual fitter said that the heel lock will be the tightest when the boot is new so it needs to be extremely secure to begin with but I'm not sure what actually counts as heel slippage.
(For more context, the store I tried the Risport at didn't have a very experienced fitter so hard to just go by their advice, in fact they only did length measurements and fit me into 245s at first. The virtual fitter recommended 240 and I went back and asked to try it on and found the 240 length did seem better, especially if it would expand while breaking in. The virtual fitter also recommended going down to B from C width (the store stocks C as standard so I was only able to try C on), but I already felt it was very snug so wasn't game enough to try too small and hope it widens with breaking in.)
Thanks in advance!
ETA minor wording correction as my original wording made it sound like the heel moved more than the tiny amount it did with the test hops
Last edited:


This really made my day. Thanks. You do have a knack for colorful narratives.
All of that was so helpful and really gives me a better idea of what fit to aim for when trying on skates and how heat molding might be able to affect it!