Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If Tuktamysheva can become world champion, so can Satoko. At least Satoko actually has programs, and good programs at that.
Who will break Yuna Kim's record?
When will they break it?
and will that performance "deservingly" break the record?
But she doesn't jump and jumping is very important in fs being a sport
I prefer kostner titles with toes, salchows, loops and maybe a flip over no jump miyahara
But if you really want to go there, I would rather watch Boyang than no quad and 3A Jason Brown.
That is music to gmyers' ears.
I'd love someone break Yuna Kim's record in a three-piece suit.
http://www.itv.com/news/central/upd...aks-half-marathon-record-in-three-piece-suit/
I think Nam Nguyen holds that record in the men's division.
http://cache3.asset-cache.net/gc/46...z/jfv4WE8dUqnb/8Lz0nZ6WMQmsVBhNyfoSim9NKY7w==


And Andrew Poje in dance.
http://fs-gossips.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/weaver-and-poje.jpg
How about Andrew Poje in a three piece banana suit?
http://ohtheseskaters.tumblr.com/image/18253940050
![]()
![]()
![]()

And Andrew Poje in dance.
http://fs-gossips.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/weaver-and-poje.jpg
How about Andrew Poje in a three piece banana suit?
http://ohtheseskaters.tumblr.com/image/18253940050
![]()
![]()
![]()
I can see Medvedeva getting WR in LP but I don't see her doing the same for SP. Mao has potential to do both as she's current holder of SP best result and that without 3-3 combination (though with 3 axel). It does not matter much though.
GOE on triples and triple combos were free to range from -3 to +3 up to 2010. Afterwards, they were factored, so that the range was limited to -2.1 to 2.1.
In any case this is a ruse, and a poor excuse. The factored GOE has led to judges more freely giving out GOEs in the +2's and +3's, so that its effect was mostly negated.
Also, the technical committee has boosted scoring potential in many other areas including:
1. Increase base value of 3Loop, 3Toe, 3Salchow and 3Axel
2. 10% bonus in the SP for second-half jumps
3. Encouraging judges to use the upper limit of the PCS range
Thank you Krislite for this detail. You seem to have some good knowledge of the judging system, especially historical. Would you help me out some more? How do you know that the factored GOE led to more +2 and +3 after 2010 than before? Is this data published somewhere by the ISU? I would love to examine this kind of data. Also, how does the ISU encourage judges to give higher PCS scores? In fact, how does the ISU ENCOURAGE the judges to do anything?
Check out ISUResults protocals. Put them the data into a table and see it rise rise rise![]()
before
http://www.isuresults.com/results/owg2010/owg10_Ladies_SP_Scores.pdf
http://www.isuresults.com/results/owg2010/owg10_Ladies_FS_Scores.pdf
after
http://www.isuresults.com/results/owg2014/owg14_Ladies_SP_Scores.pdf
http://www.isuresults.com/results/owg2014/owg14_Ladies_FS_Scores.pdf
There's no way to prove that judges started giving more +2 and +3 specifically because the GOEs were re-scaled.
although it must be said... Men's today simply are 
Well even with anonymous judging, there are still enough data to speculate the trends. Economists/Property developers can't proof anything either, but they can observe trends, weigh stocks and make analysis to see if such rates are inflated or overvalued, out of synch with reality.
Here are the protocals for WC2009 with possibly one of the greatest short program of all time in ladies figure skating with a 3 years veteran 2 times wc medalist, 2 times gpf champion + 1 time GPF silver medalist at that time
http://www.isuresults.com/results/wc2009/wc09_Ladies_SP_Scores.pdf (4 points higher TES, 1.66 lower PCS, +8.5 GOES, which would be worth = + 5.7 GOEs by today's standard)
http://www.isuresults.com/results/wc2009/wc09_Ladies_FS_Scores.pdf
vs a newbie in her first year with an unremarkable SP at GPF 2016.. can't wait for WC2016
http://www.isuresults.com/results/season1516/gpf1516/gpf1516_Ladies_SP_Scores.pdf (4 lower TES, 1.66 higher PCS, +7.1 GOES, which would be = +10.2 GOEs by Pre Vancouver scoring standard)
http://www.isuresults.com/results/season1516/gpf1516/gpf1516_Ladies_FS_Scores.pdf
Bear in mind they have adjusted the scale value, 3T has increased by 0.2, plus there's a half way bonus now. So a 3t/3t is worth 0.44 higher than prior to vancouver, while all other difficult combos reduced their stock by 0.44 in comparison on a relative basis prior to half way point excep 3A and 3A combos.
Anyone is interested in stats and trends.. why not review all the protocals and plot trends since the inception of COP and map it according by nations. It will not surprise me which particular nations sees their skaters climb fastest, which is most obstuse.
The same goes for Men's protocals vs today's +3 GOEs... Yeah kids ... these are what GOEs used to look like
http://www.isuresults.com/results/wc2009/wc09_Men_SP_Scores.pdf
http://www.isuresults.com/results/wc2009/wc09_Men_FS_Scores.pdf
Vs today
http://www.isuresults.com/results/season1516/gpf1516/gpf1516_Men_SP_Scores.pdf
http://www.isuresults.com/results/season1516/gpf1516/gpf1516_Men_FS_Scores.pdf
although it must have been said... Men's today simply
![]()