slutskayafan21 said:
The quite obvious point is that Szewcenko was 3RD at World seniors that year with the same performances almost exactly that she was judged only 4th at World juniors that year. Then you look at Kwan, the easy World junior winner being 8th at Senior Worlds, and Czako who was 2nd at World juniors that year by landing only 3 triples in the World junior long program coming 12th at the World Seniors with a much better free skate then the World juniors. If that point is not fairly obvious, then nothing would be. Talking about how remarkable Kwan did as a 13-year old in her World debuts(and I agree with that)is no way has anything to do with anything.
Few of your points are "fairly obvious".
First of all, in 1994 Junior Worlds took place in the FALL, not in the spring as it does now. Some skaters build during the season and do their best skating at the end of the year. That was likely the case with Tanja Szewczenko. And she finished behind two skaters (Kwan and Slutskaya) who were always strong competitors. No disgrace there.
As for Worlds, Tanja was 16 and would have been expected to fare better with World judges than 13-year-old Kwan. Czako, OTOH, was very young and may have lacked the presence and maturity in her skating the others did. And we have only YOUR word that she skated "better" at Worlds than she did at JW. Do you have any comparative videos to prove your point? Your memory has proved to be lacking on other occasions. Besides, there are 3 programs at Worlds: QR, SP and FS. You may have seen her FS, but how do you know how she did in the earlier segments? You were wrong about Lambiel in 2001, ranting about how well he had done in the SP, and overlooking his flawed FS.
As for the books you've read, as others have noted, they were written with strong bias. Parents and coaches manipulating the judges? Parents and coaches can offer judges nothing in return for a good placement unless they are phenomenally wealthy and can afford to bribe them. And if bribery was going on, you wouldn't see the briber parents and coaches openly approaching judges.
Federations influencing judges? Yes, I think that has gone on in the past and will still go on under CoP. A federation can retaliate against a judge by not sending him/her to any more prestigious events, or even firing him/her.
Parents and coaches influencing judges makes no sense, no matter what those biased books say.