Freud was a not psychologist (someone that might be useful to an athlete), he was a psychoanalyst (little use to anybody)
Psychology is a science.
Whereas Psychoanalysis is fruitloopery. (Or a pseudoscience if you want to be diplomatic). Its theories have no proper scientific basis. Real scientists generally pay it no heed, and the few psychoanalytical theories that have been properly scientifically tested, have resulted in them being disproven (most famously, the Oedipus complex).
Psychoanalysis does let us see qualities of thinking and has value in that regard. If you read or watch something that has emotional meaning but can't put your finger on exactly why it makes you react, a psychoanalytic approach will often give insight in a satisfying way by revealing subtexts. Subtexts are the poetic side of art and the substance of deep relationships. Here are some examples: Solitude Standing by Suzanne Vega; the movie Like Water for Chocolate; the dance called Serenata ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1C34xqImuo ). Psychoanalysis can provide awareness in art, but is rarely useful in applied science. It's like looking at a shakey bridge and feeling afraid by the rotted steel. Just knowing why you are scared won't make the bridge safe.
In confronting her dilemma, Yulia will find nothing useful in psychoanalysis. I do believe that as she develops expressively, we will see performances so rich with meaning that subtexts could be very important. Try to explain what it is in Yulia's programs that makes us watch them over and over, that makes them so expressive emotionally, why people cry. There is a lot going on both consciously and unconsciously, everything contributes to her genius.
Last edited:

Thank you.

