Phil hersch is reporting that Rafael is saying "it's too complicated to discuss" on what went wrong with nathan. What's that about?
I know this has been debated to death, but watching, it seems to me that Nathan has put on some bulk, (weight training?)or perhaps had a minor growth spurt. Yes, I know he is 18, but males, especially those who have high gear athletic lives, have been known to have growth spurts in their late teens. He seems bigger, heavier and almost taller than he was four months ago. I wonder if his jump issues are a temporary adjustment to a changing physique.
Phil hersch is reporting that Rafael is saying "it's too complicated to discuss" on what went wrong with nathan. What's that about?
Am I the only one who enjoyed the German guy, Paul Fentz?
Am I the only one who enjoyed the German guy, Paul Fentz?
Am I the only one who enjoyed the German guy, Paul Fentz?
Hmm... I honestly wonder if people really understand that 'skating skills' and 'artistic' are not synonymous. I read so many posts where people are saying things like "Adam should be getting PCS as high as (eg) Chan, Hanyu", etc.
Sure, Rippon skates 'artistically' in the sense that he's expressive, takes advantage of the music, has decent upper body posture, a nice layback, and looks 'pretty', etc. But does that mean he should be getting PCS in the ballpark of the top skaters?
No way... Rippon scratches around the ice with far less speed, poorer ice coverage, etc. He 'looks nice' and should get good interpretation scores... but I think overall many people are distracted/won over by the 'prettiness' and sequins rather than taking a step BACK and actually analyzing the mechanics of his skating. Like Jennifer Robinson back in the day - I used to think she deserved higher scores b/c she skated 'pretty', etc. Now I understand otherwise...
And re: Chan's PCS. Are you kidding me? Only 2 points higher than Jin? 4th place overall, by a significant margin?
That is the travesty of the current skating system. One single triple makes up the different of light years in terms of skating/PCS quality. That's utterly ridiculous. To say that Chen, who, again, kind of scratches his way around the rink (look, of course he's good, but I'm speaking comparatively with, eg, Chan, Hanyu, Uno, etc.) is only a couple points lower than Masters of the blade... and can throw in a single double axel and make up the difference... I mean really?!
There needs to be a way to differentiate between the PCS and skating skills to a much higher degree. Honestly, is the skating of a Chan or Hanyu or Shoma worth only the equivalent of a double axel over, eg, Chen, etc.? NO WAY!
There should be a FAR wider gap between the different tiers or skaters. As a teacher, I hate it when people throw around A's and B's like they're parmesan cheese. The AVERAGE student is AVERAGE. They have to impress the heck out of me to get a B, and blow my mind to get an A. Just b/c someone skates clean to some pretty music does NOT mean that they should outscore a master.
Nope he is not the only one for sure. But I am not on his side btw.yes you are the only one in the world.
Or maybe I just don't like his (Paul Fentz') high pants.