I understand that the level of the situation at Fukushima has been upgraded from a level 4 to level 5 by the Japanese authorities. This is, like the Richter Scale, a logarithmic scale. Level 5 is the level of Three Mile Island, where indeed, about one half to two thirds of the core fuel melted down.
From the link given, Level 5 is a "Serious Accident With Wider Consequences" and in other places I've read, this is linked to Three Mile Island.
IAEA Update
So an apt question, I think, is what 32 years down the road, do we see as the effects of the radiation release from Three Mile Island in 1979?
The answer, succinctly, as given by Pennsylvania's ex Governor Ed Rendell was, "Nobody died."
There were evacuations, there was a release of radiation, there was fear mongering, and yes, there were updates made to US reactors, but long term medical studies have not been able to conclusively determine any real increase in cancer or anything else.
http://www.nei.org/resourcesandstat...t-web-extra/three-mile-island-30-years-later/
From the vantage point of 30 years later, our most important result of TMI2's nuclear accident are the lessons we learned from it.
Let us pray that in 30 years, we will say the same about Fukushina Daiichi.
From the link given, Level 5 is a "Serious Accident With Wider Consequences" and in other places I've read, this is linked to Three Mile Island.
IAEA Update
Japanese Earthquake Update (18 March 10:15 UTC)
.by International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on Friday, March 18, 2011 at 3:22am.Japanese authorities have informed the IAEA that new INES ratings have been issued for some of the events relating to the nuclear emergency at the Fukushima Daiichi and Daini nuclear power plants.
Japanese authorities have assessed that the core damage at the Fukushima Daiichi 2 and 3 reactor units caused by loss of all cooling function has been rated as 5 on the INES scale.
Japanese authorities have assessed that the loss of cooling and water supplying functions in the spent fuel pool of the unit 4 reactor has been rated as 3.
Japanese authorities have assessed that the loss of cooling functions in the reactor units 1, 2 and 4 of the Fukushima Daini nuclear power plant has also been rated as 3. All reactor units at Fukushima Daini nuclear power plant are now in a cold shut down condition.
Further information on the ratings and the INES scale at: http://www-ns.iaea.org/tech-areas/emergency/ines.asp
So an apt question, I think, is what 32 years down the road, do we see as the effects of the radiation release from Three Mile Island in 1979?
The answer, succinctly, as given by Pennsylvania's ex Governor Ed Rendell was, "Nobody died."
There were evacuations, there was a release of radiation, there was fear mongering, and yes, there were updates made to US reactors, but long term medical studies have not been able to conclusively determine any real increase in cancer or anything else.
http://www.nei.org/resourcesandstat...t-web-extra/three-mile-island-30-years-later/
- Although a small amount of radiation was released from the reactor, no injuries, deaths or direct health effects were caused, according to more than a dozen epidemiological studies performed after the accident.
- Due in part to lessons learned and implemented industrywide after the TMI accident, U.S. nuclear plant performance has steadily improved since the late 1980s, with plants operating at higher levels of safety, reliability, efficiency and productivity from year to year. The industry’s average capacity factor—a measure of efficiency—has risen from 63 percent in 1980 to more than 91 percent in 2008.
- The accident brought about major changes in reactor operator training, plant operating experience sharing, emergency response capability, radiation protection, and many other areas of nuclear plant design, operations and maintenance.
- The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations in Atlanta was formed nine months after the accident to drive operational excellence, open communication and continuous improvement among all U.S nuclear plant operators.
- Fifty-one U.S. reactors (almost half of those operating in the U.S. today) were built in the years following the accident. Five are in Pennsylvania. They helped make nuclear energy one of the nation’s largest sources of electricity and help provide the diversity of supply that strengthens U.S. energy security.
From the vantage point of 30 years later, our most important result of TMI2's nuclear accident are the lessons we learned from it.
Let us pray that in 30 years, we will say the same about Fukushina Daiichi.