Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gonna step in and say she doesn't have the tiniest bit of beauty =/= there wasn't the tiniest bit of beauty.
However unlike your claim, you indeed compared Alaine and Rika by questioning about Rika's score and your impression on Rika's performance here.
Therefore, I showed you the example to compare Alaine's score at 4CC with the World's score. Since you're complaining about Rika's score by saying "judge's love for her" which I disagree because of her lower PCS even than Zijun's, I also think Alaine's PCS should not be higher than Rika's since Rika's jumps were much cleaner than Alaines. They both tend to UR but Rika has more consistency on FS and less URs. The competition is not just for SP, but SP and FS altogether.
Not to mention, keep in mind that Rika is almost in the same position as Alaine. This is their first senior year, but Rika beat Alaine at not only Rostelecome but also at 4CC, and got a higher ranking than Alaine in GP series. Therefore, Rika proceeded to GPF even though it was a substitute for Gracie. That is hardly a reputation as they are building their own career step by step. Rika's PCS is lower than Zijun because of her not pretty postures, but PCS also reflect the jump qualities and their flows. Once Alaine wobbles her required jumps, her PCS would be reflected as well. She did not outperform the 4CC SP, but received a better scores, so I think her SP score at Worlds is generous. Ashley, Anna and Gracie were overscored for sure, but that was not my point in my previous post. The supposition that Alaine's performing in a later group is no use since the starting order and allotted group are decided by their World ranking which reflect their results in international competitions. If Alaine did good, she would get assigned to the last two groups, which is not in reality.
Yes, thanks! Her skating, not her physical appearance! (This is Jeff Buttle's opinion, not my own.)
Miyahara's "fully rotated jumps" delusion reminds me of Polinas "perfect flip techinque" delusion. Except Polina rightfully gets dinged for hers. :sarcasm:
More like, what was performed on the ice. He's not saying her skating is inherently ugly.
How does Miyahara have a 'fully rotated jumps delusion'. Can you post a link to her comments about her jumps?
With Miyahara its not her, its everyone else. With Polina, its just her.![]()
That's like going up to somebody and saying "You're not beautiful... I'm not saying you're ugly, though... wait, what are you giving me that look?"
Obviously Buttle is referring to no ounce of beauty in her program. Which is pretty inaccurate. It's like those who say Chan is devoid of emotion.
It's hyperbole - I'm sure Buttle acknowledges that there is some beautiful aspects of Liza's program, but what he probably means is that the program lacks refinement, and aesthetics compared to other skaters. e.g. Liza's spins aren't particularly aesthetic (not that Mishin skaters are known for it)... her flying sit in particular is my least favourite, and i wish her leg was straightened.
I mean, wow. That 3A was superb! After she hit it I could see the focus on her face as she zeroed in for her next two passes. I thought she gave a lot of energy and personality to her footwork as well. I don't particularly care for her program and she's not that great of a skater IMO...but she is one of the best technicians this sport has seen in a long time. So much respect for her. I do think her PCS were a bit too high (mid 8s on almost everything?) but she's rightfully well in the lead. As long as she doesn't have a total and complete meltdown in the FS, this title is hers easily.Weird thing is that the caller was harder on under rotations than edge calls. We only had one actual edge call - the last place skater and 2 not clear edge calls. Yet all season there have been a number of edge calls at events. Just so nice that all these ladies could correct their edges before worlds!
Also just watched Gold and Daleman back to back on you tube and did not see a big difference between the two skates. Yet Gold is in the top 10 and Daleman is back in 21st place. Just goes to show the difference between being a new comer and one of the judges favs.
If 3A's are your favourite jump, you would legitimately acknowledge that Liza's triple axel was superior to many of Mao's axels (even with your blatant bias).
It actually took off the toe unlike Mao's skid take off, it got more height than Mao's (instead of depending on tight rotation), it actually gets distance, unlike Mao's which is up and down, and the rotation is unquestionable, unlike Mao's, Liza's axel (which the landing edge wasn't the most solid) had more flow on the runout than Mao's. Mao certainly is the queen of 3A, in terms of consistency, but I think the majority of us here acknowledge Liza's 3A was better.
And what "little bit more" were you expecting? She landed it and it was a strong jump. If you want to see more women to do 3A attempts why do you trivialize what was very obviously a strong triple axel by Liza?
Rhetorical or no?
I still don't get it, sorry. Ounce mean rhetorical?
I still don't get it, sorry. Ounce mean rhetorical?
It is a unit of measurement in the English system, 16 oz = one pound. It can refer to weight or liquid volume. But the saying means she doesn't have even the tiniest bit (of beauty).