Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For me, Dai is the top. Patrick could only hope to be him...

How is this thread already THIRTY pages long when they haven't even competed directly head-to-head yet?!?!?!?!!!!! [mind blown]
Oh god, ILY.For me, Dai is the top. Patrick could only hope to be him...
I think many can say the same but there will be another name at Dai's space at times.
Well, we do veer off the topic on occasion. General thougths on components and artistry again, Dai, Johnny Weir. That's how we make the 30 pages. No harm no foul.
FMI? Oh lord, honestly- when you put the words this way it sounds so very arrogant to me. Nope, Patrick leaves me cold most of the times. And nope, PCS is not equal artistic at this day and time, not anymore.FYI, there is no skater in the field (or in history) who reaches every viewer artistically or who connects with the audience every time. Some have come close (like Kwan and Takahashi), but still you can't please everybody in every program.
Also, if all current skaters skated clean, Chan would still have the highest PCS marks... and PCS is the de facto "artistic" mark. So I'd say that does equal "artistic" (at least in the judges eyes and from a competitive standpoint).
For me, Dai is the top. Patrick could only hope to be him...
Dai is magic on ice. He doesn't skate or dance to his music, he makes love to it. His 2012 WTT SP performance is EVERYTHING:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_OIF1YyQqg
Hanyu is not far behind.... the others are VERY far behind those two.... but it doesn't matter as they still score quite well... ie fernandez
i think COP has restricted furthermore what skaters can do on the ice... as it forced them into a more competitive rather than performance style of skating... of course... compare plushenko or joubert footwork pre COP... exciting and very simple.... look at what skaters do nowadays, intricate but much slower and less effective for most of them.... regarding dance.... erm.... it depends... some of it is art... some of it for me is competition/sport, just as much as figure skating... Figure skating is an art and a sport. It's not scored as much as an art anymore, but that doesn't mean it isn't, nor that the scoring shouldn't reflect it. Dancing could also be an Olympic sport, and an art at the same time, if there were certain movements that were standardized as part of it and could be empirically scored. Although, part of the inherent draw of figure skating is that it allows a kind of "altered from reality" type of movement, something the human body can not do naturally.
Yeah, a kind of "athletic dancing" wouldn't allow complete freedom, but it doesn't mean something isn't an art either. If you tell a painter they can only use the colors red and green, they could still make some kind of great painting, as long as they are allowed to actually use those colors in the way they want. Filmmakers in many parts of the world and through many eras have been forbid from doing certain things but they too still are able to sometimes make something of immense worth under those specifications.
The possibilities of art are so endless that sometimes certain limitations are not a bad thing. As long as there isn't too much limitation and the artist isn't being forced to do something that is objectively ineffective (which is the problem the sport has faced under CoP).
i understand here that we will definitely agree to disagree... but i think it's almost offensive when we talk about figure skating as art…
but that's exactly my point.... figure skating is as artistic as that IMHO But then again, we speak of the art of plumbing. And, as a current TV ad reminds us, in baseball a pitcher who can "paint the corners" is called a "Rembrandt."
It does not offend my artistic soul to toss figure skating into the category of "performance art." Mime and juggling are performance arts, after all.
FMI? Oh lord, honestly- when you put the words this way it sounds so very arrogant to me. Nope, Patrick leaves me cold most of the times. And nope, PCS is not equal artistic at this day and time, not anymore.
I myself grew up with long dead 6.0 system and I used to hate current system for a long time when 1 day I have read the great summer of 2014 (I guess?) Brian Orser interview transcript where he actually convinced me that the new system helped to award all round skaters. And I remember it because he used Stephane Lambiel as an example (and I believe that Stephane is one of the biggest artists of figure skating ever). That had to do with other elements like spins, step sequences, etc. But also- PCS.
And if you try to see PCS not as a 1 meaning field then you see the difference. As Maria Polonius kindly pointed out there are things that have nothing to do with artistry in a direct way.
Also- Patrick would not have a by default higher PCS mark with a low technical delivery, you can clearly see that even top contenders lose at PCS when they have a rough skate. Many factors could stand behind that roughness. Current system (unfortunately) is quite biased when it comes to clean technically delivered programs. Some skaters get higher PCS when they don't fall. So Patrick is not going to be safe thanks to components all the time. Not anymore. Because the Men's field is technically fantastic at the moment and with every season it will become even more competitive thanks to young guys who already started to compete at Senior level with their may I dare to say "non-artistic quads". I think that the most intriguing question that the upcoming pre-olympic seasons must answer clearly will be: PCS or TEC? I bet it on TEC but we shall see.
It's totally fine if you have that opinion (after all, everyone experiences programs/skaters in various ways), but the majority of the figure skating world does not share that opinion, sorry.For me, Dai is the top. Patrick could only hope to be him...
I don't think I was being arrogant. It's merely stating a fact. Not every skater reaches every audience member artistically so you can't really hold it against Chan for not doing that - like I said, you can't please everyone, and every skater/team has fans and haters.
Also, when all of the top skaters have skated clean, Chan has gotten the highest PCS marks (so that's simply stating facts as well). And it's a rather considerable margin of 3 points over Takahashi/Hanyu (who received their personal bests at World Team Trophy), at that.
PCS personal bests in the FS:
Chan: 96.50 (TEB 2013)
Takahashi: 93.58 (WTT 2012, home ice)
Hanyu: 93.36 (WTT 2015, home ice)
Ten: 91.40 (4CC 2015)
Fernandez: 91.18 (WC 2014)
Brown: 89.14 (WTT 2015)
Also, feel free to add another quarter to the "Chan's skating leaves me cold" cliché jar.It's totally fine if you have that opinion (after all, everyone experiences programs/skaters in various ways), but the majority of the figure skating world does not share that opinion, sorry.
Dai is the top probably in terms of musicality, interpretation and originality/creativity (certainly better than Chan), but there are also qualities that Patrick Chan has that Takahashi could have only hoped for, particularly Patrick's level of skating skills, and better quality of jumps (and quad toe consistency). Not to mention, Chan is slightly more decorated... but I don't think accolades were Takahashi's main priority or contribution to the sport (even though he did win some major competitions, including Worlds).
He should have skated to, "I can do that!" from Chorus Line.
To me, Patrick's best performance, and the one that showed his personality best, was his first Canadian Nationals championship. Obviously he wasn't going for soulful, like Takahashi, it was more "Look what I can do!"He should have skated to, "I can do that!" from Chorus Line.
Once he started adding quads and skating with more maturity, the rambunctious boy disappeared. Oh well. It happens to all of us.![]()
