Zagitova edges out Medvedeva for Oly Gold | Page 6 | Golden Skate

Zagitova edges out Medvedeva for Oly Gold

This isn't about Kim Yuna. Like I added into my post, the scoring system was too different when she competed. I'd only use her scores if I wanted to compare her head to head with Mao Asada who competed directly against her with the same scoring system and guidelines.

But if you don't think I have a point at all, that is certainly your prerogative. :)

My point is that all future competitors have benefited from their previous competitors' PCS. That seems to be the point you're making here, and it's definitely the point you made earlier. Med competed with Mao Asada, and look at her PCS in her first year a senior. She even beat Mao in PCS in the only worlds they both participated in. Medvedeva's first year PCS and Zagitova's first year PCS don't stand comparison, when PCS for juniors has risen from what it used to be, and therefore the PCS for first year seniors has risen, too.

Also, we're talking differences. Differences can be conceivably compared, unless you want to show that the "change in scoring system" also somehow changed what kind of PCS rise a top first year senior could expect?

Anyway, even if Zagitova were 10 points behind in PCS, it doesn't matter. Medvedeva's shoddy technique should've been her downfall. It wasn't, because the judges gave her better GOEs than Zagitova, but she beat her anyway.

See, to me Medvedeva should have had quite a bit more of a PCS gap in comparison to Zagitova, but Zagitova also should have had quite a bit more of a TES gap in comparison to Medvedeva, leaving the end results correct. Unless you suggest Zagitova should only get like 68 PCS, which I just cannot agree with.

I'd give them around the same on PCS, too. Probably a 68 for Zag and a 69 for Med. I just can't get behind Med's step sequence.
 
Also, my debate is not about TES. Only PCS as this is where I feel they have not been scored properly in regard to each other.

About inflation--that used to be an argument just made about the Olympics themselves. Now it's about the entire season? And is this a recent development (say the last 8 years or so) or has it always been a known thing that the Olympic season brings inflation? Everyone should recall the outcry over Sotnikova's sudden score increases at the Sochi Olympics compared to what she got even at Europeans the previous month. However, Zagitova actually scored HIGHER at Europeans in the long program both in TES and PCS. :laugh: Her PCS in Moscow was 75.30 compared to the slightly less generous 75.03 the other night.

Back to what I said before about my fascination at how they were scored as Juniors and what we can learn from it, if anything..

At 2015 Junior Worlds Medvedeva scored 59.21 TES and 59.21 PCS for a TSS of 124.49.
At 2017 Junior Worlds Zagitova scored 75.81 TES and 62.21 PCS for a whopping TSS of 138.02.

IMO Medvedeva was much better artistically but she received 3 points fewer in PCS. The disparity between the scores of these two gold medal winning Junior World programs couldn't be more apparent. And if you watched the actual performances, they would align with these scores only in some kind of weird fantasy universe. It really couldn't be more clear that Zagitova's marks have been shot out of a cannon going for the moon. :rofl2: But next you're going to tell me that there is inflation at the Juniors in pre-Olympic years as well. And that it's a known thing. Or maybe just maybe Zagitova was being set up for the OGM.
 
I don't get the point here. According to the judges, Zagitova is neither the better technician, nor the better artist. She can just do more difficult stuff. She won because of that and that alone, in the minds of the judges. :confused2:
 
I don't get the point here. According to the judges, Zagitova is neither the better technician, nor the better artist. She can just do more difficult stuff. She won because of that and that alone, in the minds of the judges.

Higher, faster, stronger.
 
The OGM jumps to the beat of the music. Impressive. She does 3lutz-3loop. Impressive. She back loads all her jumps. Most impressive. She is the rightful winner IMO. She saw an opening and took it and it paid off big time, she didn’t let her teammate’s “greatness” intimidate her, that is what the Olympics is about.
 
Also, my debate is not about TES. Only PCS as this is where I feel they have not been scored properly in regard to each other.

About inflation--that used to be an argument just made about the Olympics themselves. Now it's about the entire season? And is this a recent development (say the last 8 years or so) or has it always been a known thing that the Olympic season brings inflation? Everyone should recall the outcry over Sotnikova's sudden score increases at the Sochi Olympics compared to what she got even at Europeans the previous month. However, Zagitova actually scored HIGHER at Europeans in the long program both in TES and PCS. :laugh: Her PCS in Moscow was 75.30 compared to the slightly less generous 75.03 the other night.

Back to what I said before about my fascination at how they were scored as Juniors and what we can learn from it, if anything..

At 2015 Junior Worlds Medvedeva scored 59.21 TES and 59.21 PCS for a TSS of 124.49.
At 2017 Junior Worlds Zagitova scored 75.81 TES and 62.21 PCS for a whopping TSS of 138.02.

IMO Medvedeva was much better artistically but she received 3 points fewer in PCS. The disparity between the scores of these two gold medal winning Junior World programs couldn't be more apparent. And if you watched the actual performances, they would align with these scores only in some kind of weird fantasy universe. It really couldn't be more clear that Zagitova's marks have been shot out of a cannon going for the moon. :rofl2: But next you're going to tell me that there is inflation at the Juniors in pre-Olympic years as well. And that it's a known thing. Or maybe just maybe Zagitova was being set up for the OGM.

Well, I agree with you on PCS, but again... TES is part of the scoring too, and I explained how the judging of that aspect favored Medvedeva.

However, if we really get down to the nitty gritty, Medvedeva actually won the Free Skate. Zagitova won on her SP, which to me was absolutely brilliant and the best performance of that night.


As has been said, the entire point difference and more can be attributed to 2 things: Zagitova backloading more and Zagitova performing more difficult content. These aren't judging-based things, they're objective facts. Medvedeva won on both PCS and GOE judging. Zagitova's victory was because of her higher base values.
 
So I just did some quick research to back up my findings. Alina has always been judged more favorably than Zhenya, and it is incredibly unfair IMO. I just don't find them at the same level PCS-wise, artistically, whatever you want to call it. This advantage resulting in a disproportionate separation between the two of them is what gave Zagitova the OGM.

Let's compare: and btw, I am only concerned about PCS here. I am posting TES and TSS to not put things out of context.

Zhenya's first ever senior Grand Prix event was 2015 Skate America. In the long program she scored 66.93 TES and 67.16 PCS. She had a 1.00 deduction for falling on a double axel and her TSS was 135.09.
The pinnacle of Zhenya's first senior season was 2016 Worlds in Boston. In the long program she scored 77.76 TES and 72.34 PCS. Her TSS was 150.10. So during her first season, her PCS went up 5.18 This seems perfectly reasonable.

Alina's first ever senior Grand Prix event was 2017 Cup of China. In the long program she scored 76.09 TES and 68.35 PCS. Her TSS was 144.44.
We just saw the main event (or as it turned out to be, the nightmare) for what Alina's senior season was building towards--the 2018 Olympics in Gangneung, South Korea. In the long program she scored 81.62 TES and 75.03 PCS for a grand total TSS of 156.65. So over the course of Zagitova's first senior season (which btw isn't even over yet and very well may soar even higher @ Worlds) her PCS has increased 6.68. So not only is this a bigger overall increase than what Medvedeva received her first season, she already started with a 1.19 higher PCS score. To put this in a real-world simulation, Alina's Olympic long program was judged higher in PCS by a whopping 2.69 than Zhenya's revelatory skate to win her first World title. UNFAIR. And I don't think it's comparable to the comparison of Zhenya's WR scores in 2016 to what Yuna Kim achieved in 2010. This is only a 3 year difference with Zhenya and Alina and not the same or as many changes have taken place with the scoring or guidelines IIRC.

And I know that scores from different competitions are not supposed to be directly compared (I think that's what they say anyway??) but it gives you an extremely helpful guideline. You can clearly see that Zagitova has always been judged MUCH more favorably than Medvedeva despite IMO not being as gifted in many of the components. Therefore I feel the accurate separation between the two is not being properly applied. Hopefully people will find this as interesting as I do. Seeing the PCS scores Zagitova was receiving last season (and them being higher than what Zhenya got her last junior season) was incredibly illuminating as to how this whole thing could shake down.

Look, Zagitova was just gifted by the inflation that Medvedeva settled when she became senior. Her PCS at SA were really high for a rookie, and she was not clean. Just look at the podium's PCS of 2015 Worlds, or Tuk and Radionova PCS at euros with clean programs . Satoko at SA, even being world silver medalist, got just 63.
Her PCS jumped by 9 points from her 1st competition to 2nd, with similars performances.
So Zagitova was lucky to become senior after her.
 
So Zagitova was lucky to become senior after her.
Slightly disagree. Zag is just the top skater they chose after Med to do this for. None of the other seniors had this for them this season (though you could argue none of them won anything, either).
 
Slightly disagree. Zag is just the top skater they chose after Med to do this for. None of the other seniors had this for them this season (though you could argue none of them won, either).

Excuse me, i forgot a precision: She was lucky to be the next Russian, from Eteri team, to become senior after Medvedeva
 
Zagitova is stronger technically than Medvedeva, she has a true lutz, the most difficult combo and overall better jumps and spins.
She's natural charming (without over the top facial expression) has good body control and good arm movements. She deservedly won this.
This time that short was really well skated, the movements in the step seq were right on the accents of the music. The free is juniorish, but effective.
 
Also, my debate is not about TES. Only PCS as this is where I feel they have not been scored properly in regard to each other.

About inflation--that used to be an argument just made about the Olympics themselves. Now it's about the entire season? And is this a recent development (say the last 8 years or so) or has it always been a known thing that the Olympic season brings inflation? Everyone should recall the outcry over Sotnikova's sudden score increases at the Sochi Olympics compared to what she got even at Europeans the previous month. However, Zagitova actually scored HIGHER at Europeans in the long program both in TES and PCS. :laugh: Her PCS in Moscow was 75.30 compared to the slightly less generous 75.03 the other night.

Back to what I said before about my fascination at how they were scored as Juniors and what we can learn from it, if anything..

At 2015 Junior Worlds Medvedeva scored 59.21 TES and 59.21 PCS for a TSS of 124.49.
At 2017 Junior Worlds Zagitova scored 75.81 TES and 62.21 PCS for a whopping TSS of 138.02.

Higher TES triggers higher PCS. It is usually like this.
 
I don't recall any egregious use of his neck. Perhaps you are referring to his head/neck placement when he uses epaulement as in the croise derriere position in his Le Corsaire SP?



It looks to me like you are giving Alina credit for "potential" or efforts, giving her some allowances based on the difficulty of her skating program rather than judging her by what she actually performed. You are saying she couldn't help that her arm movements were not that nice to look at because of her skating choreography but it doesn't change the fact that her arms weren't that nice to look at.

No, not at all.

What bothers me is that Alina is subject to criticisms that are not leveled at others, eg Kaetlyn, who is also skating to ballet music.:sarcasm:

In fact, she did much more than any other skater in the field, as she not only performed a stunning number of transitions and difficult jumps but she did them with specially choreographed arm and body movements timed to music, not just at the end but also during the adagio.

As to how her arms are not "nice" to look at, it is purely a subjective view, and what I am trying to point out is that in Ballet 101, one is taught not to crook the wrists, elbows, etc., but for Russian ballet, there is a style that emphasizes obvious arm movements, plus, there is a flamenco influence added to the arm movement choreography of Alina's FS.

It is amazing how she can remember to integrate all that with such content-packed programs.

So to you, they are ugly, lacking in artistry, but to the judges, they might appreciate the play of arms down to the wrists and fingers, it might be what justifies the higher PCS for Alina.

As for Nathan, ballet isn't just posture or carriage - raising an arm is different from a dancer lifting an arm, using all of the muscle group emanating from the core. The later shows complete control to create a shape/form/line. Compare Jason and Nathan side by side doing the same move and it is more obvious.
 
No, not at all.

Then I'm not sure what you meant by the below when you were commenting that I should forgive the crookedness of her arms because of how busy her program is.

Forgive the tendency to crook, understand why she isn't allowed to hold positions for long, slow down her program by reducing the number of steps, turns, etc., and the semblance of the ballet is there.
It is important to differentiate "intent of choreography", a lot of difficult details from "mistakes", :drama:as this is unfair to Alina and the efforts put into her arms and hands choreography, her artistry.
IMO, the crookedness of Alina's limbs is a result of being in constant changing movements and positions, just as stroking would demand bent knees, though Danii's mother is also teaching her a different set of arm positions and movements popular in the style of ballet she practised.

As to how her arms are not "nice" to look at, it is purely a subjective view, and what I am trying to point out is that in Ballet 101, one is taught not to crook the wrists, elbows, etc., but for Russian ballet, there is a style that emphasizes obvious arm movements, plus, there is a flamenco influence added to the arm movement choreography of Alina's FS.

I did dance for 14 years. Not just ballet. I also did contemporary, jazz, hip hop and ballroom. My 2 sisters were professional dancers. I went waaaay past Ballet 101 and I trained in the Vaganova method so I can speak to Russian ballet arms and the Russian ballet style. Alina's arm movements are definitely not in the Russian ballet style. I don't know of any school of ballet (Balanchine included as modern as he pushed his own style) that would teach such angular, blocky arm movements without any softness to the elbows, wrists and fingers or without articulation in the hands which she flaps around as an afterthought rather than controlling the movement from the wrist to palm to fingers. Even flamenco dance requires these characteristics to the arm movements. Softness, delicacy, ease of movement...there are many different ballet schools but these qualities are always present as they are the overall aesthetic of ballet and Alina's arms were anything but.

If I had to characterize her arm movements, I would say they are some combination of cheerleading and angular Bob Fosse jazz arms and they don't fit her programs at all.
 
Then I'm not sure what you meant by the below when you were commenting that I should forgive the crookedness of her arms because of how busy her program is.







I did dance for 14 years. Not just ballet. I also did contemporary, jazz, hip hop and ballroom. My 2 sisters were professional dancers. I went waaaay past Ballet 101 and I trained in the Vaganova method so I can speak to Russian ballet arms and the Russian ballet style. Alina's arm movements are definitely not in the Russian ballet style. I don't know of any school of ballet (Balanchine included as modern as he pushed his own style) that would teach such angular, blocky arm movements without any softness to the elbows, wrists and fingers or without articulation in the hands which she flaps around as an afterthought rather than controlling the movement from the wrist to palm to fingers. Even flamenco dance requires these characteristics to the arm movements. Softness, delicacy, ease of movement...there are many different ballet schools but these qualities are always present as they are the overall aesthetic of ballet and Alina's arms were anything but.

If I had to characterize her arm movements, I would say they are some combination of cheerleading and angular Bob Fosse jazz arms and they don't fit her programs at all.

I guess I'm completely puzzled by your comments about skating being similar to ballet "plie-ing" - it's not, because of the use of very different muscle groups in ballet and in skating due to the different types of movements for both.

I don't know anyone's background here, we all just post based on the best of our knowledge, and we should let our points speak for themselves without the "backup" of CVs.

You claim to be trained in the Vaganova method thus you have the authority to judge that Alina isn't performing to Russian ballet.

This surprised me, as the Russian arms, hands, wrists are famous among the ballet community for being different from other schools, being much more expressive.

You don't have to take my word/CV for it, you can go to their website.

However, Alina's choreographer is a REAL former Bolshoi ballerina, the team is all Russian, they deliberately choreographed her programs this way, performed this way in front of millions of Russians who know Russian ballet. I, plus many many others, see the Russian method in her artistry.

Logic would suggest that after 2 years of performing/watching the program, any genuine mistakes/faux pas would have been conveyed to ALina's team.

So perhaps we should consider giving some credit to a Russian gold medalist team for KNOWING their Russian-origin stuff.

I am not trained in the Balanchine style though I understand and performed Balanchine pieces. Even if I don't, I would never critique say, American Balanchine-school choreographers for not knowing their Balanchine style. I'd do a bit more research on their style if what I see isn't what I thought I'd learned before making a conclusion.

Another point is these movements are obviously not taught as the standard in RADs but rather *choreographed* according to Alina's programs. Neither you nor I learned these in ballet school but that doesn't mean that they are not balletic. Her SP is modern abstract, her LP is Spanish in flavor. In dance/ballet, the prima ballerina doesn't perform standard studio arm movements either. One choreographs arm movements according to the TYPE of program, eg a Stravinsky is different from a Malageuna is different from a Swan Lake. DQ Kitri variations show a lot of crooked elbows, in front of the chest and with hands on the hips, as it has a flamenco influence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUuT9pipZ_I

Maybe if Alina is allowed to hold a fan it will be more obvious. :laugh: Not to mention hers isn't a ballet performance but a FS program, therefore there is even greater room for choreography.

I'm also surprised that you think flamenco's arms, hands, wrists show... soft, delicate ease of movement??? They are anything but...they are strong, angular ("blocky":laugh:) and staccato.

Go to 6:35 for a good example:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbMDH3-lBqM

There were a few moments in Alina's skate when she lapsed in ability to hold her limbs forth, but so did every other skater. Many droop or flail. This is due to the fact that they are in constant motion, and the act of balancing supersedes everything else.

I'm annoyed that commentators aren't asking the skaters to explain better their programs, their artistic intentions, their moves, so they can share interesting facts about the skater and program with viewers during the performance than make stupid talk about toilet breaks.

They can explain that the Russian ballet DQ is not really the literature DQ, but a Spanish themed romance and ALina is portraying Kitri, the lead ingenue.

I still don't know for example, if and how Alina's SP dress changed colors?

This kind of lacking in furthering knowledge about the programs, or worse, spreading misinformation (eg nothing to see in 1st half) really doesn't help to spike interest in the sport and does a disservice to the skaters and the audience alike.
 
Back
Top