Several people in this thread seem to be confusing "discrimination" with "rules and regulations." All sports are governed by particular rules and regulations. These rules do not necessarily equate to "discrimination." For example, competitive wrestling (not pro wrestling) has divisions that are divided by weight. That is not "body discrimination" - it is a rule that serves a purpose. The major sports league in the US - MLB, NFL, NBA - all have age limits. Internationally, there are minimum age restrictions in FIFA.
Figure skating also has a minimum age restriction that already exists, we should remember. So we are not arguing about "discrimination." Age "discrimination" already exists - we are simply discussing if it should be altered.
Is it discrimination against children that they can't buy cigarettes and alcohol until they turn 21?
I mean, technically, yes we "discriminate" about all of those things. However, making decisions about what is reasonable or unreasonable for people is very different than unjust or prejudice.
In addition, it is not discrimination to have rules about different elements for different levels or types of competitions, or to suggest that rules should change. Was it discrimination against skaters who were good at figures when they got rid of them? Is it discrimination against great spinners than spins are not worth more than jumps? Is it discrimination that there is a TES minimum for Worlds?
Based on some of the stuff I've read in this thread, it is clear that not everyone here is interested in having a discussion about the pros and cons of increasing the age requirement, which is why I see so many irrational attacks and assertions being thrown around. "Discrimination." Please.