Men's FS | Page 4 | Golden Skate

Men's FS

Ok Miki really needed the hug more than Takahashi!! The K&C with Miki Ando makes me scared of Nikolai.
 
Even with 1 fall it wont be easy for Verner to beat since the judges probably will not give him the same PCS they give Takahashi.
 
1 Daisuke TAKAHASHI JPN 156.33 81.33 76.00 7.70 7.30 7.80 7.50 7.70 1.00 #11
2 Stephen CARRIERE USA 137.13 67.73 69.40 6.80 6.80 6.95 7.05 7.10 0.00 #10
3 Jeremy ABBOTT USA 129.29 70.29 61.00 6.10 5.85 6.15 6.20 6.20 2.00 #1
4 Andrei GRIAZEV RUS 120.78 60.88 59.90 6.35 5.85 5.85 6.05 5.85 0.00 #2
5 Sergei DOBRIN RUS 120.39 60.59 59.80 6.25 5.55 6.05 6.10 5.95 0.00 #7
6 Sergei DAVYDOV BLR 118.45 57.05 61.40 6.40 5.85 6.20 6.10 6.15 0.00 #8
7 Shawn SAWYER CAN 117.50 55.70 61.80 6.05 6.10 6.20 6.35 6.20 0.00 #4
8 Kensuke NAKANIWA JPN 117.00 59.60 58.40 5.95 5.60 5.80 5.90 5.95 1.00 #6
9 Vaughn CHIPEUR CAN 111.55 55.55 56.00 5.85 5.40 5.40 5.80 5.55 0.00 #3
10 Yasuharu NANRI JPN 108.70 49.70 60.00 6.15 5.90 5.80 6.10 6.05 1.00 #9
11 Chengjiang LI CHN 99.21 48.31 51.90 5.65 5.00 5.20 5.20 4.90 1.00 #5


Overall standings:

1 Daisuke TAKAHASHI JPN 234.22 2 1
2 Stephen CARRIERE USA 204.98 3 2
3 Jeremy ABBOTT USA 187.56 12 3
4 Sergei DOBRIN RUS 186.53 6 5
5 Sergei DAVYDOV BLR 184.70 5 6
6 Andrei GRIAZEV RUS 182.83 11 4
7 Kensuke NAKANIWA JPN 180.70 7 8
8 Shawn SAWYER CAN 180.35 9 7
9 Yasuharu NANRI JPN 176.25 4 10
10 Vaughn CHIPEUR CAN 173.65 10 9
11 Chengjiang LI
CHN
162.77 8 11
 
Tomas Verner
This IS a new costume yes?
Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon

4t GORGEOUS!!
3f-3t Very good!!
3z-2t pl
Flying sit spin, very low positions, a little slow though
Cftwk lot of turns, crowd likes it.
Popped axel
3ax great!
3l
3f
3s-2t the toe was not that good.
Spins are good but a little slow,
Sftwk, very good, the music works for him
Combo spin to end, not that good but little head bang while doiing.
He is very VERY happy!!

I think that popped axel will make the difference, but Tomas did great!
I would put him first, but then again I'm totally biased!
 
Verner skated well but I highly doubt he will win. He singled one of his triple axels which he needed to have any chance. I doubt his PCS will match Takahashi.
 
1 Daisuke TAKAHASHI JPN 156.33 81.33 76.00 7.70 7.30 7.80 7.50 7.70 1.00 #11
2 Tomas VERNER CZE 151.30 76.30 75.00 7.65 7.25 7.55 7.65 7.40 0.00 #12
3 Stephen CARRIERE USA 137.13 67.73 69.40 6.80 6.80 6.95 7.05 7.10 0.00 #10
4 Jeremy ABBOTT USA 129.29 70.29 61.00 6.10 5.85 6.15 6.20 6.20 2.00 #1
5 Andrei GRIAZEV RUS 120.78 60.88 59.90 6.35 5.85 5.85 6.05 5.85 0.00 #2
6 Sergei DOBRIN RUS 120.39 60.59 59.80 6.25 5.55 6.05 6.10 5.95 0.00 #7
7 Sergei DAVYDOV BLR 118.45 57.05 61.40 6.40 5.85 6.20 6.10 6.15 0.00 #8
8 Shawn SAWYER CAN 117.50 55.70 61.80 6.05 6.10 6.20 6.35 6.20 0.00 #4
9 Kensuke NAKANIWA JPN 117.00 59.60 58.40 5.95 5.60 5.80 5.90 5.95 1.00 #6
10 Vaughn CHIPEUR CAN 111.55 55.55 56.00 5.85 5.40 5.40 5.80 5.55 0.00 #3
11 Yasuharu NANRI JPN 108.70 49.70 60.00 6.15 5.90 5.80 6.10 6.05 1.00 #9
12 Chengjiang LI CHN 99.21 48.31 51.90 5.65 5.00 5.20 5.20 4.90 1.00 #5


Overall standings:

1 Daisuke TAKAHASHI JPN 234.22 2 1
2 Tomas VERNER CZE 229.45 1 2
3 Stephen CARRIERE USA 204.98 3 3
4 Jeremy ABBOTT USA 187.56 12 4
5 Sergei DOBRIN RUS 186.53 6 6
6 Sergei DAVYDOV BLR 184.70 5 7
7 Andrei GRIAZEV RUS 182.83 11 5
8 Kensuke NAKANIWA JPN 180.70 7 9
9 Shawn SAWYER CAN 180.35 9 8
10 Yasuharu NANRI JPN 176.25 4 11
11 Vaughn CHIPEUR CAN 173.65 10 10
12 Chengjiang LI CHN 162.77 8 12
 
man! If only he didn't pop that axel, woulda easily won this thing!

Yeah if Verner had done the second triple axel he would have won. :( Oh well, atleast he did really well and came back strong after his poor first event. Good to see the judges give him PCS almost equal to Takahashi too.
 
Congrets to Daisuke & Morozov team! You rock guys! :agree:

Tomas Verner has a very good chance at Europeans. He had a slow start but pregresses fast. The guy is dangerous!
 
I'm glad to see Verner back, he has very nice jumps, that quad was gorgeous!

One thing I dont like about the new system is you get more points out of falling on a quad and doing 2 triple axels, then landing a clean quad, doing 1 triple axel, and popping the other. That is because you lose 7 points for popping the triple axel to a single, only 4 for falling on the quad. Under the old system a guy who landed a clean and beautiful quad and triple axel without falling would atleast be favored as far as jumps over one who fell on a bad quad attempt, and did 2 triple axels.
 
Well now with protocols I get it, I dind't realise how Dobrin could have marked that low., but quad got downgraded and he lipped.
 
One thing I dont like about the new system is you get more points out of falling on a quad and doing 2 triple axels, then landing a clean quad, doing 1 triple axel, and popping the other. That is because you lose 7 points for popping the triple axel to a single, only 4 for falling on the quad. Under the old system a guy who landed a clean and beautiful quad and triple axel without falling would atleast be favored as far as jumps over one who fell on a bad quad attempt, and did 2 triple axels.

so you basically believe a single axel is worth more than a fall on a quad. Isn't the major part of the difficulty of jumps is getting the rotations in.Takahashi also had better ride out on his 2 axels jumps. I think it is odd that Verner quad was his cleanest and most beautiful jump. He had very little flow on his triples.
 
so you basically believe a single axel is worth more than a fall on a quad. Isn't the major part of the difficulty of jumps is getting the rotations in.Takahashi also had better ride out on his 2 axels jumps. I think it is odd that Verner quad was his cleanest and most beautiful jump. He had very little flow on his triples.

Well I believe a clean quad and 1 clean triple axel is better then a fall on a quad and 2 clean triple axels. Under the old system it was actually better to pop then fall since you got no credit for jumps you fell on either, plus it detracted from the flow of the program. Atleast if you pop you dont do the jump but you dont detract from the program. Under the new system you get credit for falling on hard jumps, which is why you see so many sloppy programs with mistakes win medals. Under the old system jumps that you missed were just disregarded altogether as part of your final content, and they took into consideration the fall or other disruptive mistakes itself too.
 
there were some times when a sloppy program was gifted under the old system too...

favorites are held up in both systems...

but I do agree that sport should move forward, not back, and that skaters should get something for attempting the difficult... I think the argument is that a pop is the skater deciding mid air not to go for it... where as a fall is -hey at least they attempted to be competitive athletically.

I do think the quad is too high point wise when it's a fall...

but all in all I still have faith in the new system.
 
Back
Top