- Joined
- Mar 14, 2007
I better get Mr O’Sheas Pumpkin shaped Reese’s off post haste.It's also already on the international assignments page.![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I better get Mr O’Sheas Pumpkin shaped Reese’s off post haste.It's also already on the international assignments page.![]()
www.instagram.com
But, yeah, that's figure skating. I checked out the fp again. There's a lot to be positive about re the new Shin/ Nagy pairing. They match physically and seem to work well together. The basic elements are there on everything, but obviously need fine-tuning and polishing. Plus, they need to find an emotional connection and the right material to help them stand out. That can only come with more hard work and competitive opportunities.The jumps are okay, and at least landed fairly well in this debut
Continuing on with another team that was coached by Bruno Marcotte and Andrew Evans...
Audrey Shin/Balazs Nagy (USA, Pairs) left Andrew Evans and Tammy Gambill at some point and added Meagan Duhamel (ISU Bio). It was in their announcement post on Instagram, but was edited out to add Meagan's name. I quoted the post about their announcement since I can't go back on Internet Archive for the original Instagram post.
The picture of them with Andrew Evans is included in the Instagram announcement, but he was untagged. Tammy Gambill is still tagged though.
Audrey unfortunately will always get extra scrutiny from judges on jumps because of who her coach was. She will get things called as q and < which would not always be called as such for other skaters.I checked out the fp again. There's a lot to be positive about re the new Shin/ Nagy pairing. They match physically and seem to work well together. The basic elements are there on everything, but obviously need fine-tuning and polishing. Plus, they need to find an emotional connection and the right material to help them stand out. That can only come with more hard work and competitive opportunities.
Meanwhile, it is good that Audrey is able to land the jumps and throws fairly well under pressure, and she's handling the pairs elements quite well for being new to the discipline. What Audrey clearly has to watch out for is making sure her jump landings are solidly around. I checked judges' protocols at Golden Spin. As I suspected, Audrey received a q on the sbs 3S; and on the combo pass she got a q on the lead 3T with a UR on the 2A. Pulling for Audrey to secure those jump landings so they can maximize their tech points.
Well, I think the scrutiny is not because of Gambill being Audrey's coach, but because Audrey definitely has issues with getting fully around on her landings. Of course, UR issues have been problematic for a number of skaters coached by Gambill, for whatever reason.Audrey unfortunately will always get extra scrutiny from judges on jumps because of who her coach was. She will get things called as q and < which would not always be called as such for other skaters.
Yuma was going to win regardless due to his high-scoring sp. Why ignore obvious errors, and then call nonexistent ones. So, yep, judging can be a mixed bag.Tammy is still tagged in their team announcement, so they seem to be on good terms at least. Andrew Evans is still pictured with them in the second photo for their announcement, and he must have been in the original announcement since he was listed as one of their coaches in the Retirements, Splits and New Teams thread.Was Evans listed as part of the Marcotte coaching team for Shin/ Nagy initially? I don't recall. Tammy Gambill was listed, but I think that was mostly as an emotional security blanket for Audrey who apparently has a strong bond with Tammy. Most likely, the support from Tammy forAudrey has been via Zoom or Facetime, followed by occasional visits to World Arena in Colorado, where S/N also take advantage of physical training at the Olympic Center.
Would US likely send whoever places 1-2? I would think KO would be sent as long as they end up 1-3, but second place does seem wide open depending on who lands their jumps.Again, GS was S/N's first time out and not bad. They have been working hard, and apparentty did not want to rush their debut. Judging is always inconsistent from event-to-event in figure skating, thus results tend to be debatable. From what I saw of their programs via YouTube videos, the calls seemed fair enough. Better to get q called and be alerted after a first outing to work on getting around fully, no question, than not getting called and being slammed later at more important events.
Pairs will definitely be a battle at U.S. Nationals. I am thinking: Kam/O'Shea in first, with second a close contest between Efimova/ Mitrofanov and Chan/ Howe; and fourth a tug-of-war between Shin/Nagy* and McBeath/ Parkman. I also think that McBeath/ Parkman could surprise with two great performances and end up in 2nd or 3rd. C/H have the most experience together but they need to be more consistent and confident on the jumps and throws. E/M have lovely aesthetics, so I am hoping Alisa can conquer her equally problematic jump landing challenges.
I really enjoy watching Digerness/ Sadusky. They have good programs and they have made significant strides this season since joining MM Pairs at World Arena. D/S likely in 6th, and possibly even better, but they would need to be at their best. MarBed have been recovering from injuries, so they have had problematic outings this season. Perhaps 7th may be a closely fought contest between Williams/ Lewer; MarBed; and Korytek/ Chapman. K/C's progress has been hampered by paltry competitive opportunities due to the age-limit rules for senior international competition. Keyton/ Bearinger could also be in the at least 8th to 9th battle.
Finally, I see Cooke/Kennedy and Hanns/ Neudecker in 11th and 12th positions. But as always, anything is possible.
* Shin/ Nagy appear to have been put together as a team by U.S. fed, so if they skate well, they could be placed 2nd or 3rd. Still, I think C/H and E/M have greater skills right now as more experienced pair teams. Pewter would not be a bad placement for S/N in their first U.S. Nationals. Since only two U.S. teams can go to Worlds, I think it should be K/O with either E/M or C/H, to have the opportunity for U.S. pairs to get the best results at Worlds.
Yes, I also see regaining three spots at Worlds for U.S. pairs as extremely difficult, largely due to all the hungry, improved and improving teams internationally. Additional factors, sadly, are how U.S. pairs have traditionally lacked political backing, often been unfairly looked down on, and not always given credit for their strengths.Would US likely send whoever places 1-2? I would think KO would be sent as long as they end up 1-3, but second place does seem wide open depending on who lands their jumps.
At Worlds I see it difficult for the US to place high enough to gain the right to send a third pair to the September qualifier, but anything can happen.

It probably depends upon who places 1 and 2. There's no doubt that Kam/ O'Shea will be sent to Worlds. Even if there's a mistake or two on throw landings (Kam's improving weakness), K/O made the GPF and they have solid, competitive skills that are world class (a cut above other domestic and international teams). E/M and C/H would do well to just be consistent by cutting down on sbs jump and throw landing errors. I give E/M the advantage for 2nd at Nationals. Hopefully, they can maintain confidence. They are a beautiful team aesthetically, plus they were very close to winning two medals on the GP and contesting for GPF.Would US likely send whoever places 1-2?
Do you mean they are lacking political backing in their own federation or in the ISU in general? Megan Duhamel said recently in This and That that Kam/OShea have been judges favorites from the start, getting scores above what their technical skills normally merit, and that this year they are getting a big boost for Worlds in Boston. The PCS scores of the other US pairs even the new ones like Shin/Nagy also seem very solid.are how U.S. pairs have traditionally lacked political backing, often been unfairly looked down on, and not always given credit for their strengths.