My thoughts exactly. And Ilia didn't even try the 4A, he did a 3A. Ilia did one more clean quad, but the mistake on the second 4Lz (which made it worth less than a 3Lz) had him lose a combination so he had a triple undone compared to Sato. So in the end he was less then 4 points ahead of Sato technically.Agree. I haven't followed figure skating for awhile and just tuned in because it's the Olympics, but Sato clearly had the skate of his life, landed flawless jumps and seemed to have better overall skating skills and artistry (not Kagiyama's level but I would place him above Malinin). OK maybe Sato's spins were not great (I didn't notice this but have to go back and check) but I would have expected much closer scores. Ilia, even though he has the quad axel which is an amazing feat in and of itself, reminds me of Trusova with all her quads. And even Trusova with all her quads landed at the Olympics could not beat Anna who had fewer quads BUT the superior overall package. And even though I am not even close to a skating expert, in watching Team Japan and US's reaction to Sato's skate, it seemed like it would be nail bitingly close- clearly Team Japan thought they might have won it. I would think the skaters themselves would understand the scoring and technical content better than most of us viewers, but the scores that came out weren't even that close. I can only hope the individual program is judged more fairly.
Those 4 points were easily made up in PCS for Sato imo, as he had a flawless clean program. But that didn't happen, Malinin scored higher in PCS which is mind boggling to me.
