DING! DING! DING!
I went back and looked at the protocols because I felt the comment that Cohen was undermarked to be more skate fan-ish than fact driven. Cohen was barely punished for her 2 footed jump (should have been an automatic -1 from each judge and if the judges felt it was egregious, -2, but only 2 judges chose to give her the deduction for it at all, in fact she only got -0.14 negative GOE for it).
Here's the scoring breakdown:
Nagasu: 40.2/29.86 = attention call on the 3Lz take off. PCS breakdown: 7.43/7.07/7.75/7.57/7.5
Cohen: 39.26/30.37 = no attention or wrong edge take off for her 3z, no real negative GOE for the 2 ft jump. PCS breakdown: 7.61/7.14/7.96/7.57/7.68
Flatt: 39.39/29.96 = 3+3 included. PCS breakdown: 7.39/7.18/7.68/7.57/7.64
Actually, looking at the scores, I think Nagasu was undermarked on PCS because based on the objective criteria of SS, she should have won that category HANDS DOWN over the other 2, not been second to Cohen who doesn't have the same power, security, or depth of edge and for Nagasu's SS mark to be that close to Flatt is ridiculous.
Well, I'd actually give Cohen 9's for P/E and I and 8,5 for Ch/C. For me she just have this "wow factor".