- Joined
- Feb 23, 2014
Well, it will rather depend on how many will really stop following the sport at the end of the day. By now, both sports and television governing bodies probably hope that the scandal will bring more interest to figure skating.
True, but the "any kind of attention is better than no attention" will only go so far when your sport is perceived to be a joke. All of the short term publicity will quickly fade and skating will be perceived negatively. This the governing bodies and TV don't want, as it will erode the sport's fan base (the way it happened after SLC). Skating still has not totally recovered its worldwide popularity after 2002 (though it had been recovering). I fear if nothing is done to better define the scoring/judging then it will truly make things worse.
My big suggestions are to get rid of GOE and the bonus (along with anonymous judging). GOE involves adding a subjective measure into the objective scoring to a sport that already has a lot of subjectivity in its scoring. Grade the quality of the jumps in the PCS under quality if overall skating. Subtract for edge calls, UR's and falls. The bonus is stupid and sports fans just don't get why elements in the second part of the program should be rewarded. A soccer goal scored in the 88th minute is worth just as much a one scored in the first. In basketball, a free-throw made in minute one is worth as much as minute 39.
Getting rid of anonymous judging is a no-brainer.
I would also suggest getting rid of judges'/officials' affiliations to local national bodies and have them all simply affiliated to the ISU. By doing this, it will help to minimize local favoritism as shown in Sochi.
)
