Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I always like to see how mods edit provoking titles.![]()
I think this thread title is much better than the original one, especially since many posters actually have discussed the two skaters with equal admiration (which is what Kwan and Kim deserve, considering their accomplishments) rather than tussling over which of these two skaters is "better."

I saw someone claiming that Yuna's story "takes you back to when Korea was a developing country" which always inducesYuna is not like 60 yrs or something. She was born in 1990 and Korea was already developed by then. RICE??? Are you kidding me?
Samsung, LG, Kia??? Yeah, she saved the world. Lol
(like you said, Korea was developed, it hosted the Olympics two years before Yuna was even born) and decided to have some fun with it. But the first half of my post was mostly serious.:thumbsup:^ How's that?![]()
in short this thread will continue to bringworthy...
![]()
were an Olympic event I could totally be a GM contender. Which is maybe a good thing b/c it sure ain't gonna happen in figure skating, at least not in this life... 
Seriously, though, both Michelle and Yuna brought so much to skating, each in her own way. They're both wonderful champions, classy ladies, and represent the sport so very well.

An Olympic gold medal doesn't mean a thing, at least in contemporary history for singles. Few great skaters or performances have won more recent ones. Doesn't mean a damn thing anymore. In Sochi a mediocre skater with a relatively clean program won ladies and a mediocre skater with a disastrous program won mens. Who cares if Kwan got one or Kim another one, they have places in history most OGM winners could only dream of. Add Sotnikova to the list of skaters like Hughes and Lipinski who greatly devalued the award.
Yup. The only thing no one could save is the men event at Sochi. But given the fact that the organization was somewhat of a mess, I am trying to forgive the men for that nightmare.I don't think Sotnikova gave an Olympic performance that was unworthy of an Olympic gold medalist. I just think Kim and Kostner gave more OGM worthy performances.
As for Hughes and Lipinski, they deserved their OGMs. Lipinski thoroughly outjumped Kwan with two 3-3 combos. Hughes - even with URs - gave the cleanest, most OGM-worthy performance on the night where erroneous performances from Slutskaya and Kwan would not have been OGM-worthy. Similarly, Arakawa saved 2006 from having an unworthy OGM... I mean, Cohen being the OGM would have been ridiculous.
if only we could switch the men event of worlds to Sochi.An Olympic gold medal doesn't mean a thing, at least in contemporary history for singles. Few great skaters or performances have won more recent ones. Doesn't mean a damn thing anymore. In Sochi a mediocre skater with a relatively clean program won ladies and a mediocre skater with a disastrous program won mens. Who cares if Kwan got one or Kim another one, they have places in history most OGM winners could only dream of. Add Sotnikova to the list of skaters like Hughes and Lipinski who greatly devalued the award.
:agree: love you!:disapp: I can't imagine how you must live your life, to put down other peoples achievement like it means absolutely nothing (however it was earned) Regardless of what happens, these people work their asses off their entire lives for that one moment, they didn't just skip onto the ice and win that medal. They don't need bitter people like you degrading all their efforts because your not happy with some results. You can criticize the system but the way your belittling these athletes is disgusting. And by your logic, ANY medal is worthless because its not always the "best" or the most "elite" skaters who win, sometimes there is that underdog who comes and takes that opportunity and manages to grab that medal while the "best" skater fails and loses that medal. It doesn't make the win any less important.
Now if we're talking about unfair judging that's another matter but it still doesn't make the medal worthless because the winner still sacrificed a lot and worked their whole lives for it.
Yup. The only thing no one could save is the men event at Sochi. But given the fact that the organization was somewhat of a mess, I am trying to forgive the men for that nightmare.if only we could switch the men event of worlds to Sochi.
Still don't understand why they placed that team event before all individual events? Not to mention right before men free skate, there was another event or something happened (speed or blabla I don't remember), then all the men had to stay up very late for doping test, got up very early for practicing... I mean there was something wrong with the organization and the men had to suffer a lot. Actually I don't care who win OGM, if only it had been cleaner. Hanyu is young so he might wait for the next one. But lots of these men might never have that chance again. Then the whole thing was a mess.I think the team event was a factor, and obviously the pressure of the occasion. Such a messy men's event. Although going by the season, it seemed Hanyu would win with a fall (on the salchow) anyways. The flip was unfortunate addition. I was kind of upset about the 3S being nullified, but rules are rules... he still won and deserved to win, even with 2 falls.
Well, if I were a skater, When I go out to perform then people shout "Loser!" Or show hostility, I would fall right into the 2A. I have seen that before. There was a time I worked at a stadium (student day) and there were some guys with bad sportsmanship. They hated some certain athletes so they shouted: "lose, lose, mother******" it has been a long time so I don't remember the result but...if it were me, I would lose all the spirit anyways.Well, there's no guarantee that those undoubtedly resulted in a poor competition, but they might have.
You could even argue that the lame crowd in Russia compared to the supportive crowd in Japan resulted in a stronger competition in Japan, but we can't say for sure.
An Olympic gold medal doesn't mean a thing, at least in contemporary history for singles. Few great skaters or performances have won more recent ones. Doesn't mean a damn thing anymore. In Sochi a mediocre skater with a relatively clean program won ladies and a mediocre skater with a disastrous program won mens. Who cares if Kwan got one or Kim another one, they have places in history most OGM winners could only dream of. Add Sotnikova to the list of skaters like Hughes and Lipinski who greatly devalued the award.
Still don't understand why they placed that team event before all individual events? Not to mention right before men free skate, there was another event or something happened (speed or blabla I don't remember), then all the men had to stay up very late for doping test, got up very early for practicing... I mean there was something wrong with the organization and the men had to suffer a lot. Actually I don't care who win OGM, if only it had been cleaner. Hanyu is young so he might wait for the next one. But lots of these men might never have that chance again. Then the whole thing was a mess.![]()
I agree. I have seen Michelle Kwan skate live numerous times and there is simply nothing like here, before or since. Maybe Janet Lynn in her prime, but I am far too young to seen that live, and maybe Midori Ito due to just sheer excitement and out of the world man like athleticsm, but that would be it.
Except that controversial decisions and results happen in skating all the time. So you cant single out the Olympic results without reopening all others. You can say Kim should have won the 2014 OGM, but then say Kwan maybe should have won the 98 OGM, 2002 OGM, 95 world title, 2004 world title, so what is the difference? Fact is Kim has only 1 OGM and 2 world titles. Michelle has 5 world titles, 2 Olympic medals like Kim, and 9 world medals. Kwan's record is way superior.