- Joined
- Nov 12, 2013
:agree:The rules she was counted on were not the rules she ended to be judged by. It is like if runners would have to run the long distance marathon but on the less than a half point would be stopped and wherever they would end up would count as the final result. Would you then say that "it is her/his performance that cost her/him a spot?"
It's a moot argument, but nonetheless should be considered.
The marathon analogy is spot on. Anyone can have a poor start, but it is always the finish that really counts. Skaters are meant to be judged based on a short and a long, which taxes stamina, complexity of delivery, it's a long slog of a competition. Various skaters have different strengths, and many count on their long to truly shine as their competitors wilt under the demands of the FS. To stop the marathon and award the winners 1/3 of the way is blatantly unfair.