seriously, some people here need to chill :O
And those conspiracy theories kill me every time. Why can't you just accept some people might criticize some skaters/coach without hating them?
@tjb
By the way, I'll read the rules to cure my ignorance, thank you for your precious advice. Because you know how enlightening and clear the rules are. And you know how judges follow them so thoroughly, all the time, with no exceptions.
And I've seen Sasha's jumps (I guess Sasha=Trusova right?). Just because you think she has perfect jumps, first of all, you can say it without calling me ignorant. Second, I do not think all of her jumps are perfect to the point of deserving +3. My question (yes, it was a question, I was not affirming anything) was basically what makes a jump a +3, according to the judges? And please, don't talk about the rules, because in the books everything is so pretty, but in reality things are different.
I guess that for you to get +3 in any element, it has to be simply of undeniable perfection.
For instance, you consider that Sasha's jumps deserved +3s but did she get those GOE marks? No, she got a lot of +2s and +1s.
So if you know the rules so well and based on them you think her jumps deserved +3s, then either the judges don't know the rules as well as you or they don't think her jumps are that perfect after all.
And in case you were talking about the other Sasha(Tarakanova), it's the same case.
So, it seems I'm yet to see a jump that deserves +3 in the Junior ladies circuit and so are the judges.