- Joined
- Jan 14, 2020
Sasha is working on it.weak knee and ankle bends for her (and Trusova) certainly figure in there.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CBupV91KZOv/?igshid=hbqktpq2j6h6
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sasha is working on it.weak knee and ankle bends for her (and Trusova) certainly figure in there.

I don't particularly care about Shcherbackova's jumps. I'm worried about her skating skills. She's really lacking with the way she moves her blades across the ice - very laboured, with very weak knee and ankle bends. It causes her to lag the music at times too. For a skater with clear talent in the artistic regards, that is irritating to see. It's a problem with a lot of the Eteri camp.
Not better than Sasha. She also won all competitions in her first junior season and, unlike Kamila landed 2 clean quads. Scores are also comparable(225.52 vs. 227.30) especially considering the different scoring systems and inflation.
...PCS scoring isn't taking skating skills into account very much at all,..
-- don't come down all stiff-legged with a jolt. (Although some skarters overdo it by crouching too low to the ice to save the jump.)I love both Sasha and Kamila, but I just think Kamila was a bit more consistent with her quad in her first junior season, and is extremely well-rounded, but yes, definitely comparable. All I'm saying is that it is very possible that Kamila will be at or above the level of the 3A come 2022.
About knees, the only mention in the Skating Skills definition is "rhythmic knee action." I'm not 100% sure what that means -- I guess that the skater should not be too herky-jerky while propelling herself across the ice..I think that for the casual viewer the only time "knees" are noticible is when a skater has "soft knees" on a jump landing-- don't come down all stiff-legged with a jolt. (Although some skarters overdo it by crouching too low to the ice to save the jump.)
Here are the details of "Skating Skills" the ISU judges are supposed to be on the lookout for.
Criteria:
Balance, rhythmic knee action, and precision of foot placement Flow and effortless glide
Rhythm, strength, clean strokes, and an efficient use of lean create a steady run to the blade and an ease of transfer of weight resulting in seemingly effortless power and acceleration.
Cleanness and sureness of deep edges, steps, and turns
The skater should demonstrate clean and controlled curves, deep edges, and steps.
Varied use of power/energy, speed, and acceleration
Variety is the gradation – some of which may be subtle.
Multi directional skating
Includes all direction of skating: forward and backward, clockwise and counterclockwise including rotation in both directions.
Mastery of one foot skating
No over use of skating on two feet.
In my humble opinion, Kamila is the best skater in the world right now. Tell me who can beat her jumps, skating skills, performance ability, and most of all spins. Maybe Rika or Kostornaia can beat her in SS, Sasha in jumps, many in performance ability, and the other top juniors (Alysa, Ksenia, Dasha) come close in spins but nobody can put it all together in one package like her.
Would anyone dare to call the four quads girl the weakest one just two years ago?
I always had the opposite impression. To me, it seems like the judges give a mark for skating skills, and then just automatically repeat it 4 more times for the other components (with TR an automatic .5 lower for some reason).
About knees, the only mention in the Skating Skills definition is "rhythmic knee action." I'm not 100% sure what that means -- I guess that the skater should not be too herky-jerky while propelling herself across the ice.
There is no only one right way to skate, like some people want to present it.

In my humble opinion, Kamila is the best skater in the world right now. Tell me who can beat her jumps, skating skills, performance ability, and most of all spins. Maybe Rika or Kostornaia can beat her in SS, Sasha in jumps, many in performance ability, and the other top juniors (Alysa, Ksenia, Dasha) come close in spins but nobody can put it all together in one package like her.
It doesn't take actual skating skills into account. It takes a reputation into account, the number of transitions done, and then they craft an "SS" score. This "SS" score is then repeated four more times.
I'm fine with different approaches to skating. But I disagree that the two I mentioned get low PCS.Compared to Alexandra Trusova, Trusova is more interested in doing quads than in having pretty knees. And she gets lower PCSs (and higher TES scores). More than one way to skin a cat. It's all good, to me.
The way rhythmic knee action is most effectively demonstrated is during cross overs. However, it's simply not physically possible to demonstrate the same rhythmic knee action if you want to demonstrate more of steps and turns, multi directional skating and one foot skating which are, as you wrote, also the equal criteria of skating skills. Some skaters can choose to demonstrate speed and motion during their skating (a la Joubert) instead of long lines and elegance (Lambiel).
Inaccurate. Crossovers are hardly the only way to show rhythmic knee action (ex: this series of turns is literally a series of "knee action"), and it's possible to have "speed and motion" and "long lines and elegance" in the same program. The example you tried to use is way offbase too, as Lambiel didn't have particularly long lines, and used more body motion in his skating than Joubert. Long lines and elegance aren't exactly tied to skating skills to begin with; just look at Caroline Zhang for an example.
It would be relatively accurate to say it's not possible to have a program consisting mainly of long edges and, at the same time, have a program consisting of constant steps and turns. However, that doesn't mean it's not possible to see how someone is lacking in quality, just because they are doing constant steps and turns. The depth and security of the edges, the ability to transfer between movements, the ability to move across the ice with proper posture and usage of the blade and knee - all of this can be seen. You can also do deep knee bend while doing many of the transitions that Eteri skaters try to do. Her skaters simply aren't taught to do it or don't have the ability.
People are always doing crossovers in programs anyway. They are not magically extinct just because someone like Eteri is trying to clutter the programs with nonsense. Those times in the programs where the crossovers are happening, the skater's ability with that movement can still be seen. Crossovers have become sadly demonized in this recent era of skating, and it's interesting that you basically try write them off as unimportant. You tried to make it sound like your argument was "both ways to demonstrate skating skills are equally valuable", but in actuality your argument just gives skaters a free pass if you consider them to be doing more transitions. Since, to you, doing more transitions inherently means they should be excluded from other considerations.
Also important, "rhythmic knee action" does not mean "deep knees". One of the reasons why the Eteri school of ice skating is so problematic, is because many of the movements in those programs DON'T have rhythm to them. They are just transitions thrown in for the sake of it. It's easier to do transitions like that with no other purpose, with no specific dance-like timing and meaning behind them, no precise musicality. I had a similar problem with Patrick Chan and how his PCS got overscored - being able to show deep edges and ability to gain efficient power across the ice is NOT rhythm. You can do all the "turns, multi-directional skating, and one-foot skating" you want, but that doesn't mean you are showing complete or satisfying skating. With so many of the Eteri programs, the skater is lacking the depth of edge/knee, AND the rhythm, AND the posture, AND the bigger artistic purpose. This overall kind of skating being so rewarded and normalized is a HUGE problem (for over a decade now, ugh). The bad judging and the narrowness of the scoring system, and people taking some things written on paper too literally, has perpetuated this hellish alternate-reality state of figure skating that needs to be fixed.
Aliona is best. Kamila will challenge her when she is a senior. Is Killa Kamila eligible for senior Rusnats this year?
But I don't discount how good Valieva is. She is so good that Alysa Liu is off to a great start in her career winning two senior national championships at 13 and 14 has panicked and changed coaches. Why? Because kamila is on another level.