I have not followed the scoring details closely enough to have an opinion about this, but I will say that in general I do not completely buy into the "judges' darling" or "repuation" criticism of figre skating judging. No one is born with a reputation. A skater acquires a reputation by delivering outstanding performances time after time. As for "judges darlings," figure skating judges have a roving eye like the rest of us.
I think that this is especially true at the Olympics, which are figure skating's opportunity to showcase their sport to the world (as opposed to closed-shop events like ISU championships). Relative newcomer Tara Lipinski skated better than super-darling Michelle Kwan at the 1998 Olympics. In 2014 the judges had no problem awarding the title to Yuzuru Hanyu (just beginning to become known outside Japan) when three-time and defending world champion Patrick Chan did not skate his best. Nor was the Japanese Federation more politically influential that the Canadian at the time.
It is tue that in figure skating, as in any sport with a judging component, "a tie goes to the champion." After all, the champion became the champion by beating the old champion, so if you want to become the new champion, then you have to beat her.
Will Alysa get a champion's bounce going into next year? She will have to build up momentum throughout the fall season like everyone else. We'll see.