2026 Olympics: Men's Free Skate

[Mathman]

Cool hat.

 

[Ichatdelune]

86 PCS.... now his jumps were solid but 86??????

80.65

 

[bartlebooth]

Kyrylo, hold on!

 

[CaroLiza_fan]

Seeing Petr as the tall guy he is now, all I can think is "I remember when he was a wee squirt!"

When you see him skating like that, it makes you wonder where he would be in the standings if he hadn't hadn't had to change his SP music at the start of the week.

He might be up where I put him in my Predictions!

As it is, he goes into the lead of both the FS, and overall.

CaroLiza_fan

 

[snowflake]

Kyrylo not on

 

[LadyB]

Great result! You made us proud!
Best of luck to Junhwan and Yuma!

I'm off to watch hockey now.

 

[Sabsi]

i'm in pre period, i don't need to tell you how emotional i am

Hold my vino, sister

 

[chepe]

Really I was expecting close to 200 from that (and sounded some of the audience did too), but maybe that is fair, given how empty the program was performing-wise, and there were UR's.

Still, quite amazeballs. Did something go wrong with his SP?

 

[Azikin]

80.65

Laughable... BRAVO PETR

 

[FlossieH]

Oh Kyrylo... please get it back together...

 

[Ichatdelune]

I'm not feeling good

 

[museksk8r]

Aww, poor Marsak; he’s going to drop big time in the standings. He couldn’t have a more unfortunate skate order.

 

[ruffledgrouse]

This is heartbreaking to watch

 

[Arigato]

His jumps all look a little Q to me.

And before people scream conspiracy, he went off the ice at 114.97. I knew he had 7 elements under review. They knocked off 11 points after review. This is what I keep talking about out in the forum, to keep people straight. This is simply how scoring works. Nothing is wrong with it.

Edit: I forgot to mention, I thought his PCS should be what they used to give Shaidorov a lot - around 80. They did. So I am okay with that.

 

[Minz]

#13

Petr Gumennik |

AIN

Age: 23 | ISU SB: 169.02
Coach: Veronika Daineko
Music: Onegin soundtrack by Georgiy Zheryakov; choreo by Ilia Averbukh, Nikolai Moroshkin, Nadezhda Kokhanova

---

1. 4 Flip
2. 4 Lutz
3. 4 Loop
4. 4 Salchow + 3 Toe
5. Flying Camel Spin 3
6. Step Sequence 4
7. 4 Salchow + 2 Axe + 2 Axel + SEQ x
8. 3 Axel (UR) x
9. 3 Lutz + 2 Loop* x
10. Flying Change Combo Spin 4
11. Choreo Sequence
12. Change Combo Spin 4

TES: 103.8
PCS: 70.65
Deductions: 0.00

Total Segment Score: 184.49

---

SP: 86.72
FS: 184.49 PB

Total Event Score: 271.21 PB

KEY: * = Popped Jump | SB = Season's Best | PB = Personal Best | WR = World Record | x = bonus

 

[SmileHappy34]

Wow I dont say this often. But his score is low compared to what I thought he get. . Petr a 190 to 195 for free. Look clean on alotvif jumps. Pcs about right.

 

[TT_Fin]

Really I was expecting close to 200 from that (and sounded some of the audience did too), but maybe that is fair, given how empty the program was performing-wise, and there were UR's.

Still, quite amazeballs. Did something go wrong with his SP?

Combo 4f-2t which he just hold on.

 

[niks]

Nice skate from Petr, got all his jumps done and had quite elegant movements

More than half the elements are under revision though.... he should lead anyway

The commentators on my stream talking about how Russian skaters have been deprived of going to the international stage and Nika bowing to Petr

In the end, his tech score gets downgraded like by 10 or 15 points, but he is still comfortably into the lead and will surely gained a couple of places going ahead

 

[Skatelife]

Petr love it.

 

[Ziotic]

Really I was expecting close to 200 from that (and sounded some of the audience did too), but maybe that is fair, given how empty the program was performing-wise, and there were UR's.

Still, quite amazeballs. Did something go wrong with his SP?

Very messy landings

And before people scream conspiracy, he went off the ice at 114.97. I knew he had 7 elements under review. They knocked off 11 points after review. This is what I keep talking about out in the forum, to keep people straight. This is simply how scoring works. Nothing is wrong with it.

Which was the correct review. Especially when they look under in real time, review is almost always worse.