I'm talking about the arm movements - they were exciting but a lot can turn into too much. I suppose if you wanna get into PCS criteria, he wouldn't have done so well on "Variety and contrast of energy and of movements;" because it was high octane pretty much the whole way through. I prefer a program that has ebbs and flows to it with sharp/quick and soft/languid movements. I like lines/positions to be not only hit but also held. Again, exciting to watch and I loved it - and one of the best programs of all the disciplines, IMO - but if I'm talking about scoring and opining as to why it didn't score as high, that is one example. If we're talking about balance of choreo/program construction/leaving points on the table, he's the only skater in the top 17 who didn't have a jumping pass in the second half, too.