However, there is another possible approach if you do opt to cancel TEB all together in the GPF standings. You could go back to the GPF calculation system from the early 2000s. The one that allowed Michelle Kwan to qualify for GPF based on winning one event (though she opted not to compete there).
After Michelle's escapade the ISU changed the rules to make sure that didn't happen again.

The original concept of the Grand Prix was that the winners of each of the six events would meet in a grand finale, winner take all. If someone won more than one event, then the field was filled out by second place winners, etc.
The rules that Michelle competed under tried to honor that spirit by giving first place 15 points, but second place only 12, and so on down. Thus winning was heavily emphasized and getting, say , a second and a third -- boo, go home, who wants you?
After Michelle hoised them by their own petard, they raised the points for second, third, etc., and they also put in as a tie breaker that a skater who got her points from two different events won over a skater with just one event. (Before, the first tie breaker was highest placement in best event, so if you got a first and a nothing, that was better than two lower placements that added up to 15 points.)
With he CoP the second tie breaker is total CoP points. I suppose it would be possible for a skater to score as many points in one event as someone lsle scores in two, but I don't think this will ever actually happen.
