She deserved bronze on the merit of her SP, and the advantage it gave her over Pogorilaya. But not by 6 points.
In the FS, I would have had her PCS drop about 5-6 points and have her narrowly beating out Pogorilaya. There's no way Kostner should have cleared 200 and defeated Pogo by 6 points.
I'd have gone with no more than five points difference in PCS, but otherwise that's basically my take on it, too.
Even if Kostner did deserve that lead, it was more than made up for in the LP. She should have scored 115 at most in that segment. She was getting only -2's on GOE for a fall on a barely rotated toeloop and huge GOE's (including +3's) for a Lutz that was tilted, along with the generous scores for her spins as usual. Her PCS were just a joke, at least 8 points overscored. You can't make so many glaring, program-stopping mistakes and pull anywhere close those scores. Anna deserves credit for skating perfectly clean with lots of difficulty; her program was worth 128+ and that beats Kostner overall.
Why should she have lost eleven more points? Throwing around numbers because "I didn't like her elements" isn't persuasive. "At least eight points overscored on PCS" would put her behind Lipnitskaya, Gold, Suzuki and Wagner on that mark, and I don't see how you can justify that. Or maybe they too were overscored?
With the exception of a brief fall, there were no "program stopping mistakes" from Kostner. Pogo deserves and got credit for skating her program very well. But the TES gap was 13 points, not 23 points, and if you think that none of that should have been countered by Kostner's PCS, well, I strongly disagree.
I am with you a 100 percent on the anti-hullaballoo over the Bolero program because I simply can't connect with it. Maybe if it wasn't hyped so much and hadn't been scored almost the same as Asada's, which seemed far more powerful and athletic, in the Olympics I would be more impressed. Still it was the third best.
I didn't get Bolero last season. I finally got it when I saw Kostner live earlier in the season. She's amazing even when her jumps aren't on. I agree that Asada should have won the FS in Sochi and rightfully won it here.
But in worlds, Kostner's popped jumps and falls seemed to rattle her and distracted from her performance level so 73+ PCS seemed ludicrous when Mao's was only 72+ because Mao seemed to improve her performance after her step-out. Seems like 67 or 68 is about right, which was close to her average during the Grand Prix season. Also, a PCS of 37.4 in the short is almost without precedent, so it should be at least a point lower.
...
I think Kostner made too many errors to be given a bronze and that she was boosted by a judging and tech panel that was heavily European, which really hurt Suzuki's, Mao's and Murakami's tech scores.
"A PCS of 37.4 in the short is almost without precedent, so it should be at least a point lower." Why? Just because something is unprecedented doesn't mean it's not time for a new precedent, or we'd never have any new records.
As for the old "European judging" argument, why would skaters from Italy or Spain (because apparently Fernandez also gets a European boost) get so much love from Eastern or Northern European judges? It doesn't add up. BTW, the "heavily European tech panel" had a Japanese referee and a Canadian technical controller. The other two members of the panel were French and German, do you think they have any interest in screwing Japanese skaters to benefit their own? Are Meite and Weinzierl now considered major contenders? And do you really think a tech panel in Japan set out to discriminate against Japanese skaters?
If you're going to come up with a conspiracy theory, at least have it make sense.