"Since the very first day, it was quite evident that the judging in some cases made no sense at all," said Sonia Bianchetti, a former member of the ISU council. "This is particularly true in the program component marks, where most skaters got nearly the same for all parts.
"It clearly seems that judges base their marks on the reputation of the skater and his, her previous personal record and not on what is actually performed on the ice."
Stapleford said she is not saying the new system doesn't have its good points, but the ISU has set up an anonymous system in which dishonest judges "are home and cooled out."
She said she has received calls from many judges who are afraid to dish out marks that may be seen to be out of line with others. Along with the new judging system came a new method of assessment in which a computer picks out judges who seem to be giving marks that are too high or two low.
"You've got to give judges freedom to judge independently," she said, "[otherwise] all the work we've done for 25 years to get to the point has been for nothing."