IOC issues recommendations on RUS/BLR athletes | Page 4 | Golden Skate

IOC issues recommendations on RUS/BLR athletes

Status
Not open for further replies.

JimR

On the Ice
Joined
Dec 22, 2022
It's quite disturbing what the IOC are doing essentially trying to blackmail athletes into making a political statement when I'm sure almost all of them would rather stay neutral and not get involved in politics. This is potentially putting Russian athletes or their family members in danger of reprisal attacks.

What next do we make Afghan women denounce the Taliban or not let them compete?
 

Anna K.

Medalist
Joined
Feb 22, 2014
Country
Latvia
So, leaving it up to federations will become a huge mess.... some will do it... others won't... so now the discrimination will be not on passport but on the sport practiced .
And it may also depend on the host countries for particular events as it seems each of them can set their rules themselves...
It will be an interesting process to watch though.

So, the countries may ban Russian flag, anthem, and war-supporting symbols. The athletes would be theoretically neutral but in this case they would denounce their own government by participating because officials have said that this is unacceptable and humiliating.

Or, the countries may allow the above symbols and ban them later if it proves that allowing such symbols leads to trouble (see the example of Australian Open). It will heavily depend on what the host country is, of course. What does China say about it btw?

And it will certainly also depend on political processes that will take place at the same time.
 
Last edited:

yume

🍉
Record Breaker
Joined
Mar 11, 2016
Credit to FIFA for stripping Indonesia of the rights for the U/20 World Cup due to to take place soon, because of their attitude towards Israel competing. I understand that in a predominantly Muslim nation many would take exception to the actions committed against their Palestine comrades over many decades, but the Israeli players cannot be held responsible. It is ridiculous, and rightfully stripped of the event. If only other sporting bodies like the IOC and ISU could show the same clarity as FIFA.
Good decision. But If FIFA itself could have the same energy for everyone it would be better. They can't say athletes can't be held responsible for a country and say athletes can be held responsible for another country.
 

Weetos

Final Flight
Joined
Oct 20, 2017
I don't really understand why there is no mention of actual proper sanctions for systemic and egregious doping violations. They are basically just acting like the war is the only reason to ban anyone. For my eyes, Russia has repeatedly disrespected the Olympic movement - the athlete's promise, the olympic truce etc - and they should be properly banned for at least one Olympics if not more. I may feel for innocent athletes, but I don't know which ones they are.
 

beachmouse

On the Ice
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
So, leaving it up to federations will become a huge mess.... some will do it... others won't... so now the discrimination will be not on passport but on the sport practiced .

Equestrian sports have said they’re continuing their Russia and Belarus ban for now because they feel like the proposed neutral athlete rules are too vague.
 

icewhite

Record Breaker
Joined
Dec 7, 2022
I don't really understand why there is no mention of actual proper sanctions for systemic and egregious doping violations. They are basically just acting like the war is the only reason to ban anyone. For my eyes, Russia has repeatedly disrespected the Olympic movement - the athlete's promise, the olympic truce etc - and they should be properly banned for at least one Olympics if not more. I may feel for innocent athletes, but I don't know which ones they are.

That is an entirely different topic though. One that needs to be dealt with, but another one. I prefer them not to be mixed, because it too easily becomes an "and anyway" argumentation. Of course sometimes you have to look at the whole picture, but in this case there are different institutions who have to deal with it, different people might be affected, etc.

Equestrian sports have said they’re continuing their Russia and Belarus ban for now because they feel like the proposed neutral athlete rules are too vague.
I think that is a weak argument (from them, not you). Now, in Equestrians the question is definitely not as pressing for the sport as a whole as it is in figure skating. But in the end the IOC wording needs to be somewhat vague because the different sports have entirely different conditions and structures. In my eyes the guideline was clear enough. I think saying "this is too vague" is trying to escape the responsibility to come up with a real stance/decision for your sport.
 

lariko

Medalist
Joined
Jan 31, 2019
Country
Canada
I don't really understand why there is no mention of actual proper sanctions for systemic and egregious doping violations. They are basically just acting like the war is the only reason to ban anyone. For my eyes, Russia has repeatedly disrespected the Olympic movement - the athlete's promise, the olympic truce etc - and they should be properly banned for at least one Olympics if not more. I may feel for innocent athletes, but I don't know which ones they are.
The ones with clean tests conducted during international competitions under scrutiny of international authorities and analyzed in international labs with ultra sensitive equipment that detects pretty much anything on the list of forbidden substances. In this respect, athletes of all nationalities are equal and should be, period. You cannot call any person guilty of using if there is nothing in their blood, the sample is theirs and their behavior in respect to testing is exactly the same as any other athlete. Anything else, in my view, is rumor mongering and an incitement of ethnic hatred.
 

lariko

Medalist
Joined
Jan 31, 2019
Country
Canada
I agree with that for the kids, they cannot possibly be active in the war... but yeah... for pairs and dance, that may be another story.
I tend to think that the ISU will wait that other issues are solved first... and also, that they will not make a rule for JGP different than a rule for GP... or else, we will face ageism :) I mean at some point, let's hope that the situation gets better and that all these wonderful athletes can compete together fairly and happily.
So, you want children you yourself call inocent to suffer prejudice? This is not ageism. This is determining legal responsibility, and in all legal codes, it's written in that person's under certain age bear no responsibility versus adult person. Unless Russian children are emancipated by the sport collectively, recognized as adults. In which case, the 17 yo target and protection of the minor clauses should not apply to them... and that becomes ridiculous, because so many high profile descisons were made based on the idea that minors under 17 have no legal responsibility in figure skating speciifcally and just now. It's either everyone who is called minor is not a responsible person and therefore cannot legaly support their government or minors should bear the brunt of responsibility for everything pertaining to sport. If the minors do not have a determined legal ability to support and participate in the war, it also means that the spots were taken from Russian minors last year illegaly. That was always my understanding. Therefore, I never had any qualms, and never will about my support for junior, minor athletes allowed to the JGP. Given the exceptionally of the treatment and the prejudice shown by the ISU, plus immediate precedent of Japan receiving spots if didn’t earn, I want Russia receive JGP spots at least equal to Japanese exception last year for qualifying athletes in 13 to 17 yo range, without the use of Russian symbology in the uniforms, flag and anthem.
 
Last edited:

4everchan

Record Breaker
Joined
Mar 7, 2015
Country
Martinique
So, you want children you yourself call inocent to suffer prejudice? This is not ageism. This is determining legal responsibility, and in all legal codes, it's written in that person's under certain age bear no responsibility versus adult person. Unless Russian children are emancipated by the sport collectively, recognized as adults. In which case, the 17 yo target and protection of the minor clauses should not apply to them... and that becomes ridiculous, because so many high profile descisons were made based on the idea that minors under 17 have no legal responsibility in figure skating speciifcally and just now. It's either everyone who is called minor is not a responsible person and therefore cannot legaly support their government or minors should bear the brunt of responsibility for everything pertaining to sport. If the minors do not have a determined legal ability to support and participate in the war, it also means that the spots were taken from Russian minors last year illegaly. That was always my understanding. Therefore, I never had any qualms, and never will about my support for junior, minor athletes allowed to the JGP. Given the exceptionally of the treatment and the prejudice shown by the ISU, plus immediate precedent of Japan receiving spots if didn’t earn, I want Russia receive JGP spots at least equal to Japanese exception last year for qualifying athletes in 13 to 17 yo range, without the use of Russian symbology in the uniforms, flag and anthem.
I don't want anything but the end of the conflict. That's all... I am saying that there is no way to have the children of JGP compete when some of them are already adults, as some juniors are indeed under 18, while others are 18 and over...
 

Regjohn1

Rinkside
Joined
Nov 16, 2021
The ones with clean tests conducted during international competitions under scrutiny of international authorities and analyzed in international labs with ultra sensitive equipment that detects pretty much anything on the list of forbidden substances. In this respect, athletes of all nationalities are equal and should be, period. You cannot call any person guilty of using if there is nothing in their blood, the sample is theirs and their behavior in respect to testing is exactly the same as any other athlete. Anything else, in my view, is rumor mongering and an incitement of ethnic hatred.
This.
 

lariko

Medalist
Joined
Jan 31, 2019
Country
Canada
I don't want anything but the end of the conflict. That's all... I am saying that there is no way to have the children of JGP compete when some of them are already adults, as some juniors are indeed under 18, while others are 18 and over...
I also want world peace. But kids 17 and under prohibited from competing is in a legal contradiction (and not just by the letter of the law, by its spirit) to pretty much everything else as of the point of the MOC's latest announcement. If ISU wants to stay in tune with what MOC stated, allowing the athletes who do not personally support war (which automatically included and always included the minors) is the right thing to do. It is a true statement, just as the invasion is criminal is a true statement as determined by the corresponding international legal authorities. Laws have limitations and there are jurisdictional issues. But in these two cases, the responcible authorities made a call. MOC delegated the descisoon to ISU. It's now down to ISU.

Now, I don't know what ISU will do, but I will keep checking every Monday to see if there is an official communication for JGP. As you know, I will support JGP regardless of the decision, but I am interested in ISU's statement.
 
Last edited:

4everchan

Record Breaker
Joined
Mar 7, 2015
Country
Martinique
I also want world peace. But kids 17 and under prohibited from competing is in a legal contradiction (and not just by the letter of the law, by its spirit) to pretty much everything else as of the point of the MOC's latest announcement. If ISU wants to stay in tune with what MOC stated, allowing the athletes who do not personally support war (which automatically included and always included the minors) is the right thing to do. It is a true statement, just as the invasion is criminal is a true statement as determined by the corresponding international legal authorities. Laws have limitations and there are jurisdictional issues. But in these two cases, the responcible authorities made a call. MOC delegated the descisoon to ISU. It's now down to ISU.

Now, I don't know what ISU will do, but I will keep checking every Monday to see if there is an official communication for JGP. As you know, I will support JGP regardless of the decision, but I am interested in ISU's statement.
I understand what you are saying but then, there is the law and the application of the law.
It makes no sense to me to allow one group and not all groups back. I don't think kids under 17 will get a special treatment, because of everything it implies. For instance, making it unfair for other skaters of junior age who are above 17. Also, look at the reactions when Eteri showed up at worlds? Do not forget about visas... Linitsev was kept out of so many events earlier in the year... Do not forget about traveling... It's not easy for Russians to travel right now. And on top of that, if tennis players are mentioning how awful the locker rooms are at this point, and these are adults, I don't think it would be smart to put in the same events, skaters from Russia and skaters from Ukraine.
Honestly, figure skating can wait. That's just my opinion... we will have to leave it at that because we simply disagree :)
 
Last edited:

Magill

Record Breaker
Joined
Sep 23, 2020
Germany and Denmark already cancelled their events as well. Poland issued rules for the participation of Russian and Belarussian athletes in the fencing event held in April, maybe the first set of rules for an actual event after IOC had published its recommendations. According to these, R&B fencers wishing to compete would have to submit a signed statement saying they did not support the war in Ukraine, were not associated to Putin's regime and were not employed by military or special forces and their agencies. Poland reserved the right to check the truthfulness of these statements and claimed they were perfectly following IOC recommendations. Russia announced the rules were "humiliating" and "unacceptable" and they would not send their athletes to the event.
Actually it is based on more than one media piece, but here comes just one of them, not to link too many
https://www.lemonde.fr/en/sports/ar...to-olympic-qualifier-in-poland_6021464_9.html
To follow up on this story, International Fencing Federation revoked the rules proposed by Poland and imposed the general "Russians can compete" rule they had come up with in early March, even before the IOC issued they recommendations. So Poland cancelled their event all together, like the countries who had done it before, receiving a lot of support for this decision from other European countries. They are working now on a joint case to be submitted to CAS (sic!).
Meanwhile, some 300 fencers, including top athletes of this sport, signed a letter to the federation protesting Russians being allowed back to compete.
Seems the world of fencing has been sent into a huge, huge mess...
Maybe it does not hurt to know that until recently the president of International Fencing Federation was a Russian oligarch who stepped down only after Russia invaded Ukraine.
https://wsau.com/2023/04/07/fencing...eration-rejects-proposal-on-russian-athletes/
 

jersey1302

On the Ice
Joined
Jan 10, 2016
Country
Canada
War aside.. it’s the doping that irritates me. You have a nation that not only currently has highest number of doping cases in sport by a massive margin. The entire 2014 scandal is absolutely ridiculous and has shown to go back far before then. They haven’t learned anything they’ve just got better at hiding it. The drugs Valieva took are a trifecta. 1/3 drugs in her system were banned but together they improve endurance, oxygen flow and reduce fatigue. Russia needs to be banned completely for sporting events. any athlete living and training in Russia or any affiliated country should not be allowed to compete. Sorry not sorry.
 

Regjohn1

Rinkside
Joined
Nov 16, 2021
War aside.. it’s the doping that irritates me. You have a nation that not only currently has highest number of doping cases in sport by a massive margin. The entire 2014 scandal is absolutely ridiculous and has shown to go back far before then. They haven’t learned anything they’ve just got better at hiding it. The drugs Valieva took are a trifecta. 1/3 drugs in her system were banned but together they improve endurance, oxygen flow and reduce fatigue. Russia needs to be banned completely for sporting events. any athlete living and training in Russia or any affiliated country should not be allowed to compete. Sorry not sorry.
As lariko said earlier, Russian samples are evaluated during international competitions under scrutiny of international authorities and analyzed in international labs with ultra sensitive equipment that detects pretty much anything on the list of forbidden substances. In this respect, athletes of all nationalities are equal and should be, period. You cannot call any person guilty of using if there is nothing in their blood, the sample is theirs and their behavior in respect to testing is exactly the same as any other athlete. Anything else is rumor mongering and an incitement of ethnic hatred.
 

jersey1302

On the Ice
Joined
Jan 10, 2016
Country
Canada
As lariko said earlier, Russian samples are evaluated during international competitions under scrutiny of international authorities and analyzed in international labs with ultra sensitive equipment that detects pretty much anything on the list of forbidden substances. In this respect, athletes of all nationalities are equal and should be, period. You cannot call any person guilty of using if there is nothing in their blood, the sample is theirs and their behavior in respect to testing is exactly the same as any other athlete. Anything else is rumor mongering and an incitement of ethnic hatred.
Samples nearing events of international standards are generally fair game but that doesn’t mean they aren’t doping while training leading up to events up to a certain timeframe. During the Russia olympics the Russian secret service and gov officials were in on a scheme to swap out positive tests. 12 Olympic medal winning athletes fromRussia had positive samples that were tampered with or swapped out. They Dr Rodchenkov swapped out dirty samples at night and even admitted to saying he couldn’t do it in daytime with people around. There’s full emails laying out the scheme. Take your blinders off.. Russia hasn’t stopped doping,, they’ve gotten better at hiding it. Unless Russian athlete are submitting daily samples and being tested by a complete independent WADA appointed agency I won’t believe for a second that they have stopped doping. Let’s face that.. for that to happen in Russia would be almost impossible to carry out.
 

BlissfulSynergy

Record Breaker
Joined
Sep 1, 2020
Country
Olympics
If the figure skating section of the ISU thought it were to be advantageous to leave the ISU ... don't you think it would have done it already? Just saying...
Sadly, it ain't a matter of whether speed skating section has any thoughts of leaving being advantageous or not. Speed skating has glommed onto and stuck like glue to figure skating. The co-opting is so cemented, that figure skating entity don't even know how to think for themselves. They've been controlled for so long! :palmf: :cry:

When one rebellious, enterprising leader of figure skating attempted to rally a revolutionary split, in 2003, the attempt failed miserably. It was not well-planned because there was not enough strategic foresight, nor solid support, but it was a brave effort. The rebellion's leader and courageous visionary, Ron Pfenning of the U.S., was thanklessly voted out and banned from further participation in the sport. The soft support for separating crumbled completely, as all the figure skating members fell back into their weak, fearful, secondary roles.

Figure skating entity has always been viewed by speed skating entity as the lesser than sport, but also as speed skating's personal cash cow that can never split away to find freedom and autonomy.

It's mostly been advantageous for speed skating to infinitely control and hold on to figure skating. Not the other way round.
 
Last edited:

4everchan

Record Breaker
Joined
Mar 7, 2015
Country
Martinique
Sadly, it ain't a matter of whether speed skating section has any thoughts of leaving being advantageous or not. Speed skating has glommed onto and stuck like glue to figure skating. The co-opting is so cemented, that figure skating entity don't even know how to think for themselves. They've been controlled for so long! :palmf: :cry:

When one rebellious, enterprising leader of figure skating attempted to rally a revolutionary split, in 2003, the attempt failed miserably. It was not well-planned because there was not enough strategic foresight, nor solid support, but it was a brave effort. The rebellion's leader and courageous visionary, Ron Pfenning of the U.S., was thanklessly voted out and banned from further participation in the sport. The soft support for separating crumbled completely, as all the figure skating members fell back into their weak, fearful, secondary roles.

Figure skating entity has always been viewed by speed skating entity as the lesser than sport, but also as speed skating's personal cash cow that can never split away to find freedom and autonomy.

It's mostly been advantageous for speed skating to infinitely control and hold on to figure skating. Not the other way round.
are you saying the figure skating brings all the cash to the ISU and are brainwashed by the speed skating section into staying with them?

I have a hard time buying that. Sorry.
 

BlissfulSynergy

Record Breaker
Joined
Sep 1, 2020
Country
Olympics
are you saying the figure skating brings all the cash to the ISU and are brainwashed by the speed skating section into staying with them?

I have a hard time buying that. Sorry.
First of all, you are reframing what I said. I'm not asking you to buy what I have said and there's no need to reframe my words either. There's a reason why the attempted coup happened, and why it was supported initially by Dick Button and Paul Wylie at a press conference during Worlds 2003. There's also a number of reasons why the attempt failed.

I will shortly expand on my thoughts and share some history I discovered that I used to wonder about. It answers a lot of questions. But I'll share what I discovered and where I discovered it in a separate thread. Of course, no need for you to read anything or buy anything if you aren't so inclined.

Meanwhile, here's Dick Button's famous 2003 rant, which you can also easily skip:


The coup was, in part, inspired by the 2002 Olympic judging scandal. It grew out of frustration over gnarly issues the sport was facing, but it was largely formulated due to fatigue with and restless opposition against $peedy Cinquanta's unchallenged reign/ regime.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top