“Raising the age limit is a quick fix that will deny athletes a performance on the biggest stage, and ultimately not make a difference in stopping the abuse” (c), and I'm with Tara on this.
The sport is expensive. This change does nothing for the athletes except taking away 2 years when they could be making money. They will still train hard, they will still get injured, they just won't get paid for it.
The injuries are cumulative, and the overall probability of getting a serious one is proportional to the career length. This change forces a longer career = forces more injuries. Or opting out before they even happen.
Long career is not necessarily a good thing unless you are top of the top. See lets say Bruno Massot interviews on how he was taking money from parents to support himself in an age when most people actually support themselves just fine. Long career also doesn't match with getting an education (while we have some exceptions, university + top skating does't match).
Overall, this is basically just a "sweep it under the carpet and make the athletes pay for it" from ISU.
The sport is expensive. This change does nothing for the athletes except taking away 2 years when they could be making money. They will still train hard, they will still get injured, they just won't get paid for it.
The injuries are cumulative, and the overall probability of getting a serious one is proportional to the career length. This change forces a longer career = forces more injuries. Or opting out before they even happen.
Long career is not necessarily a good thing unless you are top of the top. See lets say Bruno Massot interviews on how he was taking money from parents to support himself in an age when most people actually support themselves just fine. Long career also doesn't match with getting an education (while we have some exceptions, university + top skating does't match).
Overall, this is basically just a "sweep it under the carpet and make the athletes pay for it" from ISU.