skatinginbc
By saying "Given that I know p→q is true if p is false", I show some (regardless of the amount I demonstrated) of my knowledge about logic. To negate the premise "Skatingbc knows NOTHING about logic" needs only one opposing incident. It is like in order to negate "None of the trees are green", you only have to show "One of the trees is green".
Then you could talk about this statement only, without making another one. Purely the logic is about rules, not about what you should demonstrate with it.
Daniel5555, you probably did not realize when p is false, no matter q is true or false, the whole statement will still be logically true. I was being nice and did not make the "q" part as insulting as could.
When you said p is "obviously true", it gave me an impression that you were monopolising the truth, instead of talking with logic. Poor thing, Daniel, poor poor thing.
No, you don't get it. The whole statement is not true, because just looking at it, you realize, that there is no connection between the fact you know/don't know logic and me knowing/not knowing logic.
I don't know, what you want to achieve with this. Yes, you are capable of making statements "If ..., then" and associate them with p→q. And so what? That doesn't make you capable of logical reasoning.
skatinginbc and all
Making a public statement within the framework of logic is part (though not whole) of maintaining professionalism. In my opinion it was logically flawed to say "This can ONLY be construed as a move intended to hurt the skater" when there existed an alternate explanation (no matter how slim it was perceived) that Brian might have revealed the LP music simply out of mouth slip. In addition, when Yuna said “Stop telling lies”, she already implicitly defined what “the truth” was and therefore, borrowing Daniel way of saying, had asserted “the monopoly of the truth”. Both statements were unnecessarily inflammatory and could have been avoided if Yuna’s camp had a more competent agent.
I have no problem when people say:
1. It is a fact that Brian’s “inconsistent” interviews have been interpreted by some as lying.
2. The ambiguity in Brian’s interviews could be construed as a tell-tale sign for lying.
And I would even go so far as to accept the following argument:
3. Since the ambiguity in Brian's interviews has caused such confusion in many people's mind, we should not blame Yuna for being confused with it as well.
I don't know about what others say, but this is exactly what I try to say. I never said, I think, that Brian was lying for sure. There are 4 possibilities in total and it's hard for me to believe that Brian is lying on purpose.
However, I do have problems when people claim:
1. It is a fact that Brian clearly lied in his interviews (when it is not clear to some people).
2. Skatinginbc has no idea what logic is (it is wrong and unnecessarily inflammatory).
If logic is not important, are we now all speaking out of emotions?
I'm glad you have problems with this. One my problem is why people say like it's a fact that Brian was fired on 2 of August, when ATS says that it was not the case. It is as wrongly as say that Brian was lying from our point of view, because we were not there, we don't know. Brian and Yuna must know who is lying or they may be confused both, but at least they were there and know it better than we.
My main complaint about Brian Orser is the way he made his statements. Let's assume, that he is right and Yuna with ATS were disrespectful to him (that's not a fact, but I can assume it for now, even though I don't believe it).
Let's consider it like this:
"Yuna and ATS were disrespectful to me, because I tried to contact them numerous times, but they ignored me. It is very painful for me, because I considered that we were friends all this time and it's hurting me very much. If, Yuna, you read this, I would like to tell you, that if you have any problem with me, I would like you to tell it me clearly instead of playing dumb, because I don't like it. I also hope, that you will decide what to do with your life yourself, instead of letting your mother do it.
However, said all this I would like to thank you for the wonderful years spent with you. I also hope that you will stay at my Cricket Club, because it's a perfect environment for you and you have a lot of friends here. I am pleased with having you here. I also would like to say, that if you would like to reconsider your decision or just want to ask me something or receive any advice, come to my office. My door is always open for you."
Wouldn't it be the same about Yuna's actions as he presents them, but the tone is entirely different? I'm sure Yuna wouldn't cry if he said it like this. Now talking again about the maturity here...
The only thing we know for sure, because we saw it even on TV, both Korean and Canadian, is how Brian presented his complaints. I think it was an incorrect way. Now who of them caused all this in the first place, who was more disrespectful, etc., we don't know that. I only say that I don't know that. I know that it could be Yuna even though I'm her fan. But it's hard in any case, because both Brian and Yuna have an excellent record of them as persons. So I rather will believe in some miscommunication problem.