Kimmie was robbed and should protest, Kostner was greatly held up and I wonder why...SPEEDY?!
IOW...you're trying to tell me she's still around? WTH?? Why isn't she banned???
That happens to me too, but only during the first download. It's always been fine for me for the second but actually first viewing for me and everytime afterwards. If you can handle listening to snippets of sounds every minute or five minutes for the first go round, see if whatever you want to watch at YouTube isn't fine after hiting the "Play Again?" button.
Just found out in what passes for our local "news" paper that Broadband may be here by this time next year. Finally...A step into the 21st Century!! I'll still believe it when I see it though.
Yes. From what I hear, Kostner skates with great speed, that can only be appreciated when watching her in person.
Something is wrong when even the commentators don't understand the score and have to wait, sometimes hours, like the rest of us to see the protocols. Get rid of levels and let the judges call the jumps as they see them. But make sure the judges are not corrupt.
IOW...you're trying to tell me she's still around? WTH?? Why isn't she banned???
Which whistleblower would that be? The only one I know of is Sally Stapleford, who followed her report on M. La Gougne (for which she was not suspended, of course) with an attempt to start a rival federation, for which the ISU banned her and the other founders. The Court for Arbitration in Sport held it up. Didn't we discuss this a few months ago? I seem to recall someone quoting from "The Second Mark" and a whole lot of analysis of motivations and behavior of people we don't know .Only whistleblowers get banned from the ISU - cheating corrupt judges get banned for a couple of years and are then invited back to the fold in a shower of love.
As to the actual topic of the thread, Kimmie Meissner's PCS score was among the highest on the SP - 3rd or 4th, I think.
Which whistleblower would that be? The only one I know of is Sally Stapleford, who followed her report on M. La Gougne (for which she was not suspended, of course) with an attempt to start a rival federation, for which the ISU banned her and the other founders. The Court for Arbitration in Sport held it up. Didn't we discuss this a few months ago? I seem to recall someone quoting from "The Second Mark" and a whole lot of analysis of motivations and behavior of people we don't know .
Was any wrongdoing ever proven against Tatiana Danilenko? Could it be that she was misunderstood, or that she said something that came out different in English than she would have intended? It's not her first language, I imagine. I really don't know anything about the context, and Christine Brennan's column gives none.
Was any wrongdoing ever proven against Tatiana Danilenko? Could it be that she was misunderstood, or that she said something that came out different in English than she would have intended? It's not her first language, I imagine. I really don't know anything about the context, and Christine Brennan's column gives none.
Where did I suggest Danilenko had something to do with the PCS? I must note, however, that the judges also gave Kimmie some negative GOEs for her non-jump elements. Make of that what you will...But Danilenko had nothing to do with that. In fact, listening to this conversation makes me wonder if the judges might have even decided Kimmie was being treated unfairly by the technical panel and given her the PCS to try to compensate.
Ant, you have to put in emoticons, or how will read between the lines?antmanb said:I was being sensationalist for the story!! Still It's a shame that instead of banning Stapleford and the other ISU officials who supported the WSF, the ISU didn't just accept that fair judging is not a thing that the ISU should shy away from and should have accepted it.