- Joined
- Apr 18, 2012
then he should move there,
not blabber continuously like a rabid moron who doesn't know anything about the Olympics time, cost and hosting a venue
neither is he an athlete, already the governments and athletes themselves are against the boycott
Fry and Takei are examples of selenity gone overboard
Firstly, this is a serious issue. It should not be swept under the carpet by the wilfully blind and morally bereft.
Secondly: Hey, free speech. Value it.
Thirdly, at least some governments (Canada and the United States) are putting pressure on the Olympic Committee to make sure that there are proper safeguards for the athletes and visitors. If those assurances can't be given, this issue will not die on the basis of "time, cost and hosting" issues . . . certainly not to those with a conscience.
A call for a boycott or changing the venue is premature. Mr. Takei's and Mr. Fry's comments are extreme at this stage. Mr. Takei's suggestion is impractical. But the effect of his saying what he has said is that people are being made aware of the issues, which the Olympic committee would love to be smothered by everyone's concern about "time, cost and hosting". (And for some people, it works.) That should never happen.
There are hopefully ways of participating, without being wilfully blind to the issue while ensuring the safety of athletes and visitors. But if there are not, some very hard decisions are going to have to be made. This issue is not going away on the basis of "time, cost and hosting". Quite frankly, the suggestion that this should be decided by anyone on the basis of "time, cost and hosting, is to me a sick one.

) is, "Selenity now, selenity now!"
