- Joined
- Mar 23, 2010
^ If you look at actual competitons it is hard to see how the changes in the base values in the triple toe and triple Salchow are going to have much effect at all. For instance, if the 2014 Olympic long programs had used the new values instead of the old, Kim, Gold, and Lipnitskaia would have got an extra 0.62 points, Sotnikova would have got an extra 0.64 points, and Kostner (who did 2 of each) would have got at extra 0.86 points. Everyone's score gets elevated by a pretty much the same amount, with no change in the outcome.
As to the value of the 3Lz+2T combination, it is not so clear to me that this should be worth a whole, whole, whole lot more than a solo triple Lutz. Top skaters can tack a double toe onto just about any well landed jump. Maybe the ISU feels that any triple-triple is better than no triple-triple.
But that is the thing. It is not about 0.2 points here and there. Points are meaningless without the context of who are competing, how they are used, how the field have competed and how they are applied. What is good skating? What makes a good competitive sport? What makes difficulty of a jump combination? Is it the one with the best choreography, well executed program that able to integrate and elevate all the elements together with the music with suitable choreographic transitions to express something profound or just points gathering exercise? A good sport require a healthy balance of competitive variability for everybody to compete more or less equally in the methods of their choosing. A poor sport is one with rules and conditions which only allows a few 'privileged' competitors chance to podium, while everyone else can only compete on the privileged skaters' mistakes.
This is not about the the Kim, Gold, Lipnitskaia I am concerned about. It is about everyone else. Or more precisely - it is about the likes of them 'before' they became such household names of the figure skating world to compete with the leaders of the sport, say Michelle Kwan. Under current system, by approximately equating the value of easiest and hardest, and even allow the easiest to surpass the hardest after half way mark, now theoretically as long as Michelle does 3T3T in the second half of all her programs due to the way PCS and sometimes GOEs are applied to the elite skaters. Everyone else has practically little chance EVEN when they bring a 3A/any difficult triple triple combos (unless they also do them in second half) which is the only area they can compete on since they don't have the PCS, and very likely GOEs without a few more consistent competitions before the judges marks are able to catch up.
Thinking back now, it was a blessing we had Yuna and Mao who uphold the ladies technical standards when they totally didn't have to. They are not only aiming just to win, but to uphold elite standards of what the best of this sport is capable of at the highest level. They could have totally got away with what Carolina's strategy - conservative content, grow consistency, compete on PCS and reputation. Or Miki Ando/Morozov choreography in WC2011 FS - 8 of her 11 jump elements were stacked one after another immediately after half way point with little or no choreography/transitioning in between. Totally exploit the half way system, 2nd half heavy while first half other than the opening combos are all about time wasting, posing 'artistic' meandering choreography from the same spot, take full advantage of slow music for breathing space before the set up for jumping marathon points crunching. She didn't even need a 3/3 to manage this. Its choreography score is less than 0.29 difference from something like Homage to Korea. So clearly having good balanced choreography don't mean much either. Like it or not. Liza will rule even without good choreography and she don't even need the 3A to do it. She just need 3T3T after half way point because of inadequacy of COP including judging tendencies. She and others like her. Last season's 'competitive' scene has become bit embarrassing, it has become a game of chicken, as long as the top tier skaters goes relatively clean following easiest and safest tech content to ensure consistency, nobody has a chance to get close. Weirdly, they actually benefit from judging latency effect be part of their points 'gathering/keeping/momentum brewing' campaign. When judges inflate certain skaters despite a poor performance, it actually benefit their next skate - should they do well. It actually made no sense to do your best every time, but more like don't do too well too early, it ain't worth it. It can hurt your later season competitions. What makes it frustrating is ISU is apparently totally endorsing this direction of the sport with these latest point value changes by reducing the only area where skaters outside the top contenders can compete on, and that is difficulty.
Last edited: