Another point that needs to be addressed. Young children across America are taught to be politically correct (PC) where everyone gets the "participant" trophy. It is hard to go from PC in most activities to "win" in a select few.
I don't really see anything incorrect about encouraging children to participate in sports for the fun of it.
Looks like the ceiling for the U.S. is 4th place, as always. Ugh.
Looks like the ceiling for the U.S. is 4th place, as always. Ugh.
I wasn't a fan of Flatt but she was never a choker. if only Gracie had Rachael's competitive nerves Gold would have been on the podium today.Interesting article. One of the commenters brought up an interesting point: the US has never supported figure skaters as they would be in communist countries, yet from 1961 to 2006, someone was always on the podium. So why is it different now? My guesses:
1. It just got way, way more expensive all of a sudden, with prices for ice time, costumes, etc. shooting up. Not a skater, so I can't confirm my suspicion, though.
2. New scoring is so much more fair than old scoring. Now that it's not as political, the US judges can't call in favors like they used to to get our girls on the podium. This suggests that there was something dicy about some of the past winners--not prepared to believe that.
3. New scoring is so much less fair than old scoring. American hating judges can conveniently overlook UR's and bad edges on the Russian or Japanese girls of the moment, but an American gets away with nothing. I suspect that may be the case, but again, can't confirm.
4. Sport suddenly got very popular in certain countries, just more competition. Countries do rise and fall dramatically (China in pairs, for example, and US and Canada in dance).
5. Kids are different. There are less girls willing to give up school, friends, etc. to compete. As a teacher in a girls' school, I noticed a change in my students around 2006, when cell phones that had media on them became common. Maybe it affected the teen girls at the rink as well.
6. Or, what I think the answer probably is-- the US has just a bad run of chokers and people with some sort of flaw. Ashley and Gracie came in 2nd and 3rd in the long program. One or both should have been on the podium, but that would involve putting 2 good programs together in the same competition.
However, the bad run of chokers that preceded them: Mirai, Caroline, Alissa, Rachael--probably turned off interest in the sport, which turned off the pipeline of girls who want to compete. A shame, either way. But not the fault of the government.
I wasn't a fan of Flatt but she was never a choker. if only Gracie had Rachael's competitive nerves Gold would have been on the podium today.
Interesting article. One of the commenters brought up an interesting point: the US has never supported figure skaters as they would be in communist countries, yet from 1961 to 2006, someone was always on the podium. So why is it different now? My guesses:
1. It just got way, way more expensive all of a sudden, with prices for ice time, costumes, etc. shooting up. Not a skater, so I can't confirm my suspicion, though.
2. New scoring is so much more fair than old scoring. Now that it's not as political, the US judges can't call in favors like they used to to get our girls on the podium. This suggests that there was something dicy about some of the past winners--not prepared to believe that.
3. New scoring is so much less fair than old scoring. American hating judges can conveniently overlook UR's and bad edges on the Russian or Japanese girls of the moment, but an American gets away with nothing. I suspect that may be the case, but again, can't confirm.
4. Sport suddenly got very popular in certain countries, just more competition. Countries do rise and fall dramatically (China in pairs, for example, and US and Canada in dance).
5. Kids are different. There are less girls willing to give up school, friends, etc. to compete. As a teacher in a girls' school, I noticed a change in my students around 2006, when cell phones that had media on them became common. Maybe it affected the teen girls at the rink as well.
6. Or, what I think the answer probably is-- the US has just a bad run of chokers and people with some sort of flaw. Ashley and Gracie came in 2nd and 3rd in the long program. One or both should have been on the podium, but that would involve putting 2 good programs together in the same competition.
However, the bad run of chokers that preceded them: Mirai, Caroline, Alissa, Rachael--probably turned off interest in the sport, which turned off the pipeline of girls who want to compete. A shame, either way. But not the fault of the government.
4th is the new 1st
Looks like the ceiling for the U.S. is 4th place, as always. Ugh.
It's shame when people are calling keeping 3 spots a reason to celebrate. These athletes need better mental toughness so they are giving their best in every competition.
Sorry not sorry but all the excuses they give are overrated.
ITA. National Champs and a World Team should be selected with skaters who have competitive fire and the heart of a champion, where winning is the only goal to set their sights on. If keeping 3 spots is exciting, or 'winning isn't everything' and they should just be happy with their 'comeback' in the free skate... well, I will let that sort of sporting mentality speak for itself...
I believe this generation of skaters is used to people accepting mediocre results and thus they have no real drive to push past whatever mental blocks they have.