Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
https://twitter.com/yuzu1207_s/status/1474036471472726020?s=21Is there any video of him landing other jumps in practice? I want to see how well his right ankle is working without the 4A attempts.
sorry, it was literally forwards.I thought his last jump was q and 2ft but def not downgraded.
I thought you were speaking of the two first jumps in your previous message.sorry, it was literally forwards.
People on twitter going crazy saying its 'q' and its spreading like wildfire, but at the point of landing his feet are forwards.
watch in slow motion.
That being said I heard he was going for stability over rotation. Possibility he can improve on rotation with adrenaline and not putting free foot down.
To clarify, here are photos taking at point of landing for the jumps: https://imgur.com/a/f6W4INi
I've taken the point of landing from each one, they were all forwards.I thought you were speaking of the two first jumps in your previous message.
The first was downgradable, the second much underrotated but maybe not to the point of DG, the third was q or < depending on the tech panel (clearly over 90° but we see sooo many < jumps called as q from some skaters...)
I have seen this last one under several angles and I got sure that it was very far from 180°. It looks 2ft to me but I read that his free leg didn't really touch the ice.
He said in his interview that his objective was only to get the right axis depending on the ice quality, not to fully rotate, that he wouldn't have tried to fully rotate at the end of a practice and that he was satisfied depending on his objective.
He's likely to show a real one during his RT at FS practice after the SP.
Let's be clear, I'm not pretending it was a real q. To me it was clearly not. I just say some skaters would have had a q call instead of < and the q is not defined precisely. I really think it was moderately < but I admit I couldn't slow down and enlarge the feet as much as I'd like, I'm rather an IT dummy, and the unusual two feet respective positions is indeed confusing.I've taken the point of landing from each one, they were all forwards.
The reason the last one looked q is he landed forwards on the toe, put his other blade down, then went back up on toe, whipped to q, then went out on an edge.
The second one, also forwards, whips to underrotated in similar way.
This isn't hanyu cheating or anything, it's simply because the rotation is so fast that it'll have the tendency to whip quickly to backwards no matter where he lands. He's not trying to hide it or anything, he's simply going for stability rather than rotating.
Slow mo each jump, and stop it at the point the toe touches the ice. Each one is forwards landing.
It's still impressive, but I won't lie and say its "q" or anything.
Edit - this is the last jump that was posted in the video showcasing all the 4A on twitter: https://imgur.com/a/qwGDdWR
As you can see, the right foot came down forwards, and the left foot (free foot) came down round about q - this could be another reason for his confusion.
The reason this happens is he is turning his hip out and trying to take the leg out for landing to stick a safe landing. If he doesn't do this, he might go to < instead of <<
Let's be clear, I'm not pretending it was a real q. To me it was clearly not. I just say some skaters would have had a q call instead of < and the q is not defined precisely. I really think it was moderately < but I admit I couldn't slow down and enlarge the feet as much as I'd like, I'm rather an IT dummy, and the unusual two feet respective positions is indeed confusing.
Also, the forwards (backwards for an Axel) notion is for prerotation, not underrotation. For underrotation it's more precise, it's 180°.
Not in this angle debate but still on this 4A, someone compared motion captures of his WTT'21 best attempt and of yesterday practice:
In fact I'm not an old FS fan and don't know old rules and terms, and even if this was recent it doesn't seem surprising that your coach spoke of forward, anyway in a skating lesson that's what it amounts to. In addition to that, given TP interpretation of q (which mathematically should be hardly less frequent than sextuple jumps if one follow ISU definition) an easy extrapolation gives a freer interpretation of the rule (p.19).When I trained triple jumps, whenever I downgraded one my coach always called it "forwards" when I downgraded them. Fans nowadays may use whatever terminology, but that's what we used when training, and I've heard other coaches use the same.
Even though its not about degree of UR, in the picture you posted 4 hanyu frames from the end you can see his foot touchdown forwards (180° if that's preferred terminology).
now, my analysis of the two:
Hanyu seems to be taking more speed from his 4A entrance, and that's converted to length within the jump. This arc probably makes the jump more comfortable for him.
In his sp today, the height of his triple axel was insane (to the point where the 3A must have felt uncomfortable). If anything, it seemed higher than his 4A attempts (probably as he was taking time to get into rotation).
For all we know, the timing might "click" and he could be much closer on the 4A tomorrow (if you combine the 3A from today with the rotation from 4A practice).
Either way, I'm no longer worried about Hanyu breaking his ankle on this jump, as the landing looks safe even if rotation isn't quite there.