Carol Heiss did and surely Sonja Henie must have.
you don't win 10 world titles by skipping years!
but yes she did: 1927-1936
Carol Heiss did and surely Sonja Henie must have.
Why doesn’t Jason Brown take from known technical coaches like Frank Carroll or Tom Z. full time? He could be untouchable if only he could master the 3Axel and quad jumps. Such a pity because his basic skating is so artistically gorgeous!
Just out of curiosity, did Mark Mitchell step on someone's toes by any chance? Not even first alternated is just distasteful!
MM's not the friendliest guy in the world. But maybe he's just shy. At 2014 US Nats in Boston, I met Frank Carroll, who could not have been more polite or gracious even though he had a crowd of people around him angling to say hello and talk to him. I was impressed.
If quads were so easy, I would be doibg one. But they are not. I guess from a certain point you get too old for quads.Why doesn’t Jason Brown take from known technical coaches like Frank Carroll or Tom Z. full time? He could be untouchable if only he could master the 3Axel and quad jumps. Such a pity because his basic skating is so artistically gorgeous!
Adam has medaled more times on the Grand Prix in the past two years than Ross has HIS ENTIRE CAREER.
Adam beat Ross earlier this year as SkAm. Adam beat Ross at US Nats in 2015 and 2016. Adam has been to the past two GPF, Ross has never made them.
There are criteria in place. Sorry that you don't understand or don't like them.
Edit: This is NOT an Olympic Trial and is not billed as such. Perhaps if you stopped looking at it like that, you'd understand.
But they said (even on NBC) it was based on three tiers of criteria [emoji17]I don't accept it. Then again, I'm still bitter figures got eliminated. HA.
If Nationals isn't the biggest competition of the year for US skaters then they need to stop announcing the team directly after the results, because they make it appear that the Nationals results ARE the important factor.
Well, I don't even know what to say other than that I'm Ashley-furious on Ross's behalf. I didn't think they'd give him both Worlds and Olympics, but neither?!? And not even first alternate for either!?!?! :dev2: I say this as a Jason fan, but it's ridiculous for him to be positioned higher than Ross as an alternate. :disagree:
And really, they didn't even give Grant 4CCs? That's just incredibly disrespectful and truly does give the appearance of playing favorites.
I do understand sending Adam to the Olympics. He has had a great season, and the precedent was set for bumping the bronze medalist for a very compelling pewter medalist, plus he's a mostly consistent choice for the team event. I just truly don't get why they chose Vincent over Ross. Ross beat him here fairly, despite Vincent's insane PCS. It's not like Vincent had a great GP season. I think the same argument that some have made about Ross having only one great performance at nationals applies to Vincent this season just as much. Plus, the international judges have not shown any inclination to reward Vincent with PCS the way he was here, along with the large number of URs he always gets.
This really leaves me with a bad taste in my mouth Also: if Ross complained about this, I think it would lower the public impression of skating even more. I convinced some friends to watch with me who don't follow skating closely, and they're all convinced ditching the silver medalist is unjustified. I can't imagine many would feel differently outside of some of those who follow skating regularly.
ETA: Even though this isn't considered Olympic Trials, NBC/NBCSN definitely made it seem that way. Friends that watched with me had the impression this was the key deciding factor for the Olympic team.
Ross can't formally protest can he? I guess it would be even more dramatic if he did. Maybe the US Federation should just adopt a point system 2 years before and including the Olympic year, total up all the points for each skater overall and then Nationals points in pre-Olympics would count toward the total of the last 2 seasons and the Olympic year and it would be all based on numbers not placements or how well you skated at Nationals at all....pretty much i guess almost like the poster from Germany said....a point system. No more closed door private meetings as if the Fed were betting on horses. Keep it real simple. Have a funeral service for placements at Nationals and tell all that winning Nationals to earn a spot at the Olympics is dead. No more dark horses coming from behind anymore....no more surprise disappointments or surprise joy.
Ross can't formally protest can he?
If you accept that the national championships aren't the be-all and end-all of selection - and they are not, and USFSA has stated as much - then no, Ross Miner did not get done dirty. This is his first time on the podium at nationals since 2013, where he won silver. And Miner promptly went to Worlds in 2013 and contributed to the U.S. not getting a third spot at the Olympics the next year by finishing 14th.
Or, to look at it another way, do you exclude Adam Rippon based on 10 seconds after he skated brilliantly last year and this year? The selection criteria allow USFSA to base Olympic team selection (and Worlds, and 4CC, etc.) on more than just the podium finish at nationals. And, if Adam and Jason had skated well, Ross would've been fourth and none of this would matter. Ross had one good skate out of all his competitions this fall. Adam had 10 seconds of a problem all year.
Per USFSA, nothing counted before 2017.
Hehe
Well, I definitely agree that he has a lot of work to do. The arm opening is a definite downside.
In general, PCS scores seem like a whole load of hogwash to me, and not just at Nationals. So, I definitely don't disagree with you there. Mainly they shouldn't be in a +/-.50 range across all categories. That is totally ridiculous. However, we may disagree on who deserves more or less.
For me, I really disagree about the moment where he stopped and then started again at a slower tempo. I think he created a memorable, emotionally full moment and totally changed the feeling in the room in a striking way.
Whether or not he succeeded, I could tell that there was detailed work in relation to performance, composition and intention. Hopefully he'll keep moving in that direction and improving; seems already more mature than last year. At the very least, I think he skates with an unpretentious open-heartedness.
But, in any case, my original post was a comparison of Zhou and Miner, whose performance I found to be really lacking in detail, depth, or memorable choreography. I thought it was buoyed only by his performance technique (which I find to be shallow) and the fact that he skated it cleanly. But I'll take it over a peptic ulcer or sucking on a rotten shallot! [emoji23] I didn't dislike Miner's skate when I was watching it, I just found it uninteresting artistically.